Re: LUKS overhead (was Re: encrypted root fs on a slug and crypto-modules)

2008-04-03 Thread Bill Gatliff
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Tobias Frost schrieb: to throw another number into the round, I got around 2-3 MByte/s on the new ABI. BTW: Does someone know a Mini-PCI crypto accelerator card fit for LUKS/device-mapper? I found some two solutiions the net, but all of them are very "secret", that is y

Re: LUKS overhead (was Re: encrypted root fs on a slug and crypto-modules)

2008-04-03 Thread Tobias Frost
Yes, this is the other card I found. However, as written on some list (lost the URL), the 2.4 driver must be buggy as hell and datasheets are subject to NDAs. > > Boards, http://www.caviumnetworks.com/acceleration_boards_Mini-PCI.htm) > > VPN 1411 from Soekris could in theory help: http://soekr

Re: LUKS overhead (was Re: encrypted root fs on a slug and crypto-modules)

2008-04-03 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Tobias Frost schrieb: to throw another number into the round, I got around 2-3 MByte/s on the new ABI. BTW: Does someone know a Mini-PCI crypto accelerator card fit for LUKS/device-mapper? I found some two solutiions the net, but all of them are very "secret", that is you need probably a NDA t

Re: LUKS overhead (was Re: encrypted root fs on a slug and crypto-modules)

2008-04-03 Thread Tobias Frost
to throw another number into the round, I got around 2-3 MByte/s on the new ABI. BTW: Does someone know a Mini-PCI crypto accelerator card fit for LUKS/device-mapper? I found some two solutiions the net, but all of them are very "secret", that is you need probably a NDA to get more infos like dat

LUKS overhead (was Re: encrypted root fs on a slug and crypto-modules)

2008-04-03 Thread Jon Dowland
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:54:29PM +0100, Anders Lennartsson wrote: > As a further note on the subject of this thread, I did manage to > install Debian Etch on a fully encrypted USB-stick (1 GB) with two > partitions, one for root and one for swap. I used default settings for > LUKS encryption whic

Re: Kexec on ARM? (Was Re: encrypted root fs on a slug and crypto-modules)

2008-04-03 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Thu, 03 Apr 2008, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > kexec and kexec-tools work on debian-arm - I use it on FSG-3: > > http://wpkg.org/Running_Debian_on_Freecom_FSG-3#kexec Great. I just managed to get kexec-tools compiled. Now I've to go and compile that kernel! Regards, Kapil. -- -- To

Re: Kexec on ARM? (Was Re: encrypted root fs on a slug and crypto-modules)

2008-04-03 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Kapil Hari Paranjape schrieb: Hello, On Thu, 03 Apr 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-01 16:15]: However, I note that there is supposed to be some support for kexec on arm since 2.6.22 but it is not built-in for the Debian kernels. Is the reason

Re: Kexec on ARM? (Was Re: encrypted root fs on a slug and crypto-modules)

2008-04-03 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Thu, 03 Apr 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-01 16:15]: > > However, I note that there is supposed to be some support for > > kexec on arm since 2.6.22 but it is not built-in for the Debian > > kernels. Is the reason for this documented

Re: encrypted root fs on a slug and crypto-modules

2008-04-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Anders Lennartsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-09 23:54]: > > Thanks for your report. I'll add crypto-modules when we update the > > installer to 2.6.24. (Which will happen after beta1 is released, > > which should hopefully be soon.) > > Thanks for spotting my report and adding the modules.

Re: Kexec on ARM? (Was Re: encrypted root fs on a slug and crypto-modules)

2008-04-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-01 16:15]: > I didn't check that kexec is currently not supported on "arm" > under Debian. :-( > > However, I note that there is supposed to be some support for > kexec on arm since 2.6.22 but it is not built-in for the Debian > kernels. Is the r