Re: non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 09:08:58PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > > Now after a quick relook, I think the issue is fstatat64. both find and > > rm call it, but arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c doesn't have a shim > > to convert the stat64 struct oldabi <-> e

Re: non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Riku Voipio
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 09:08:58PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > Now after a quick relook, I think the issue is fstatat64. both find and > rm call it, but arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c doesn't have a shim > to convert the stat64 struct oldabi <-> eabi for this function. > Fix is probably trivial,

Re: non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2008-03-27 Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > clone 462677 -1 -2 [...] > reassign -2 fileutils > retitle -2 findutils fails oldabi arm userland with armel kernel: > thanks > See #462677 and. > http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2008/02/msg00073.html > for previous discussion. I presume f

Re: non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Stone
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 09:08:58PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: Now after a quick relook, I think the issue is fstatat64. both find and rm call it, but arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c doesn't have a shim to convert the stat64 struct oldabi <-> eabi for this function. Sounds plausible. Fix is p

Re: non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Riku Voipio
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 02:04:10PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > If someone can show that it is a coreutils problem, and have > some kind of reproducible case I'd be happy to look at it more. Ok, but I'd still like to keep the bug open in coreutils, so people can find it. > point I don't see wh

Re: non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Stone
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 05:21:32PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: See #462677 and. http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2008/02/msg00073.html for previous discussion. I presume findutils has moved to the new *at syscalls as well. The syscalls themself appear to work as accepted, but rm gets confused nev

Re: Detect serial connection during boot

2008-03-27 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:45:26PM +0100, Lars C wrote: > Hi > I would like to make an check during boot up that would detect if I have a > serial connection is connected. > > Is this possible to create? could use some *ioctl**(* ()to check the DTR/RTS > and could I somehow integrate this with Gr

Detect serial connection during boot

2008-03-27 Thread Lars C
Hi I would like to make an check during boot up that would detect if I have a serial connection is connected. Is this possible to create? could use some *ioctl**(* ()to check the DTR/RTS and could I somehow integrate this with Grub so if a serial connection is detected the kernel is started in fa

Re: non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Riku Voipio
clone 462677 -1 -2 reassign -1 coreutils retitle -1 rm assert error on arm with armel kernel: ((status) == RM_OK || (status) == RM_USER_DECLINED || (status) == RM_ERROR) reassign -2 fileutils retitle -2 findutils fails oldabi arm userland with armel kernel: thanks See #462677 and. http://lists.d

Re: non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:35:53PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Did see a non-working rm for some time in coreutils, which runs in an > arm chroot, on an armel kernel. now I have a non-working findutils as > well. Non-working how? It doesn't start? Or it bombs out with an error? Can you prov

Re: non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:35:53PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Did see a non-working rm for some time in coreutils, which runs in an arm chroot, on an armel kernel. now I have a non-working findutils as well. The machine is a n2100, running the iop32x kernel from unstable. 1. What is the actua

non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Did see a non-working rm for some time in coreutils, which runs in an arm chroot, on an armel kernel. now I have a non-working findutils as well. The machine is a n2100, running the iop32x kernel from unstable. The last working versions of these binaries are coreutils 5.97-5.3 findutils 4.2.3

Re: non-working coreutils and findutils in arm chroot, running armel kernel

2008-03-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Michael Stone writes: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 08:35:53PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >Did see a non-working rm for some time in coreutils, which runs in an > >arm chroot, on an armel kernel. now I have a non-working findutils as > >well. The machine is a n2100, running the iop32x kernel from u