Bonjour :
On a remarqué l'imence travail que vous avez fait pour ameliorer votre site
pour qu'il soit aussi connu et avec un bon contennu ! pour ça on Vous invite
cher webmaster a t'inscrire dans le nouveau Site de nom de domaine
http://www.ic.ma/ http://www.of.ma/ Enregistrez votre .of.ma & .i
Bonjour :
On a remarqué l'imence travail que vous avez fait pour ameliorer votre site
pour qu'il soit aussi connu et avec un bon contennu ! pour ça on Vous invite
cher webmaster a t'inscrire dans le nouveau Site de nom de domaine
http://www.ic.ma/ http://www.of.ma/ Enregistrez votre .of.ma & .i
Bonjour :
On a remarqué l'imence travail que vous avez fait pour ameliorer votre site
pour qu'il soit aussi connu et avec un bon contennu ! pour ça on Vous invite
cher webmaster a t'inscrire dans le nouveau Site de nom de domaine
http://www.ic.ma/ http://www.of.ma/ Enregistrez votre .of.ma & .i
On Wed 2007-08-15 12:57:43 -0400, hong zhang wrote:
> I unpacked embedded browser DILLO. I run "file dillo"
> and showed it was an executable file for linux 2.4. I
> copied dillo to my arm board with linux 2.6. And run
> dillo but returns " -sh: dillo: not found"
> Is this caused by linux version
Gordon,
I unpacked embedded browser DILLO. I run "file dillo"
and showed it was an executable file for linux 2.4. I
copied dillo to my arm board with linux 2.6. And run
dillo but returns " -sh: dillo: not found"
Is this caused by linux version difference?
henry
--- Gordon Farquharson <[EMAI
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:57:57PM +0200, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> I'm searching for a good tool chain for Linux and Windows to distribute with
> the new product running Debian for ARM. I have found one binary distribution
> that is working for Windows and Linux. The problem is that the path to
>
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Theoretically (and practically also), an EOF should *never* be compared
> to a char: only to an int.
>
>> --- open21xx-0.7.5.orig/as21/cpp.c
>> +++ open21xx-0.7.5/as21/cpp.c
>> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
>> /* - 2 to leave room for testing comments and
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:25:54AM +0300, Eugene Sanivsky wrote:
> Previous throughput measured on custom rootfs using
> GLIBC2.3.5pre/GCC3.4.4 (CS2005q3-2 Provided by CodeSourcery).
I don't really want to toot our own horn here, but you're comparing a
generic Debian compiler - focus on correctnes
Hi,
I'm searching for a good tool chain for Linux and Windows to distribute
with the new product running Debian for ARM. I have found one binary
distribution that is working for Windows and Linux. The problem is that
the path to libc.so.6 is hard coded in the compiler. So one must
"install" e
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:25:54AM +0300, Eugene Sanivsky wrote:
>I am experiencing serious performance regression with new armel
>libc/compiler.
>I see up to 45% degradation in Samba throughput for example.
Samba is a very complex piece of software, and you have changed every
single
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:25:54AM +0300, Eugene Sanivsky wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I am experiencing serious performance regression with new armel
> libc/compiler.
>
> I see up to 45% degradation in Samba throughput for example.
>
> Previous throughput measured on custom rootfs using
> GLIBC2.3.5pr
Hi,
I am experiencing serious performance regression with new armel
libc/compiler.
I see up to 45% degradation in Samba throughput for example.
Previous throughput measured on custom rootfs using
GLIBC2.3.5pre/GCC3.4.4 (CS2005q3-2 Provided by CodeSourcery).
Same Linux kernel used, both
12 matches
Mail list logo
