Re: Kernel configuration file in Debian/NSLU2

On 5/6/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Xan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-06 19:34]: > 2) Secondly, maybe I want to enable selinux that it's installed but > not activated. For do that, I have to change and put "selinux=1" in > kernel parameters (following the http://wiki.debia

Re: armel Performance

Just out of curiosity, have anyone that is using armel done any real life performance comparisons against ? The FFTW people ran their benchmark on a 233 MHz armel slab here, obtaining 22.5 faster performance than old Debian arm on 200MHz. Of course, that's pure FP, soft float in both cases thoug

Re: Kernel configuration file in Debian/NSLU2

* Xan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-06 19:34]: > But for that, I need to know what are the configuration file of the > default kernel (2.6.18-4-ixp4xx) You can find it on your slug in /boot/config-* > 2) Secondly, maybe I want to enable selinux that it's installed but > not activated. For do that,

Kernel configuration file in Debian/NSLU2

Hi, I have a slug and I installed debian with the installer (following http://www.cyrius.com/debian/nslu2/install.html) Now, I have the system working fine, but I want to make several things: 1) the one is securing kernel. Specifically, I want to install grsecurity patch to the kernel (or on

Re: cause for armel nss (i.e., firefox) build segfault

# On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:45:01AM +0100, Wookey wrote: > > Looks sane? > > > > It's of course a stupid idea to depend on a particular layout of the > > jmp_buf structure in application programs, but oh well. People write > > ugly buggy code, film at 11. > > Especially mozilla people. They ha

armel Performance

Hi Just out of curiosity, have anyone that is using armel done any real life performance comparisons against ? What i'm after is not pure FP benchmarks, rather if you seen any performance difference running the same set of services. /Mikael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit