Re: armel /lib/libpam.so.0: no version information available

On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 11:38:22PM +0100, Kevin Price wrote: > Hi! Hello, > > rebuilding the samba package now, that should get rid of it. > > The version you made didn't work for me, but that's probably due to > its experimental status. See the error messages in the pm. > > I built an unmodi

Re: armel /lib/libpam.so.0: no version information available

Hi! Lennert Buytenhek schrieb: > rebuilding the samba package now, that should get rid of it. The version you made didn't work for me, but that's probably due to its experimental status. See the error messages in the pm. I built an unmodified 3.0.24-4 from debian, which seems to be working fine.

Re: gcj for armel?

Peter Naulls wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Guys: Does anyone have an assessment of gcj for armel? Is it just around the corner, or is it horribly broken and looking to stay that way for a while? Want to give us a run down o