Re: ~urgent , Re: binNMU? mplayer_1.0~rc1-10_arm.changes REJECTED , not signed

On 2006-12-23 11:28 +0100, A Mennucc wrote: > hi everybody > > (I am CCing this in d-arm .) > > 'mplayer' 1.0~rc1-10 was correctly built on ARM but the upload from > 'smackdown' was rejected . See > http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=mplayer > and the attached message. > > (It seems that this

Re: restricted sourceless ARM uploads

On 2006-12-20 19:58 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:32:25PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote: > > > > Could you try those packages on hedges? (You can get developer access > > from Wookey if you need it). Hedges has 512MB real and 1.5GB swap. And > > unlike leisner, the net

Re: restricted sourceless ARM uploads

On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > A prime example is the "tar" testsuite which is very picky about > > filesystem behaviour. > > - With a real ARM CPU building on local (USB) storage, it passes all tests > > - With a real ARM CPU over NFS the testsuite fails one t

~urgent , Re: binNMU? mplayer_1.0~rc1-10_arm.changes REJECTED , not signed

hi everybody (I am CCing this in d-arm .) 'mplayer' 1.0~rc1-10 was correctly built on ARM but the upload from 'smackdown' was rejected . See http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=mplayer and the attached message. (It seems that this is a recurrent problem: see http://wiki.debian.org/ArmBuilddWatc