Re: [Pkg-mono-group] Bug#394418: v3 v4 question

2006-10-29 Thread Mirco Bauer
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 21:07 +, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 09:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Ok, is there some other difference at the instruction set level between the > > netwinder and cats systems? > > No, the instruction sets are the same. FWIW, though, smackdown i

Re: Bug#394418: v3 v4 question

2006-10-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 09:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Ok, is there some other difference at the instruction set level between the > netwinder and cats systems? No, the instruction sets are the same. FWIW, though, smackdown is actually a cats, not a netwinder, and the build seems to be fail

Re: Bug#394418: v3 v4 question

2006-10-29 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, is there some other difference at the instruction set level between the > netwinder and cats systems? The mono build failures are very consistent in > happening only on the netwinder systems AFAICS, and I'm p

Re: Bug#394418: v3 v4 question

2006-10-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Mirco Bauer wrote: > As said I am not a porter, so I don't know the difference between cats > and netwinder, but AFAIK cats is v4l and netwinder is v3l. > > Upstream tests and only has access to arm v5l and can't reproduce this > problem, as seen in the up

Re: question for ARM porters: incomplete arm v3 support in etch?

2006-10-29 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:50:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm inclined to tag 394418 etch-ignore, because most of the arm buildds (all > > of the faster ones) are capable of handling newer

Re: question for ARM porters: incomplete arm v3 support in etch?

2006-10-29 Thread Marc Singer
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:50:44PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hello, > > Bug #394418 is a report filed regarding a recurring build problem with mono > on arm that results from mono generating code that's incompatible with the > arm v3 instruction set. Likewise, it appears shadow fails to buil

Re: Newer kernel for nslu2

2006-10-29 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Michael Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-29 15:34]: > Sorry. No! I restart the box and I do not hear the harddisk working. > Using the old flash it works again > > debian-sda1.bin support the Intel network card. Does the newer version > do it also? No, and that's probably why they weren't upgra

Re: Newer kernel for nslu2

2006-10-29 Thread Michael Ott
Hallo Martin! > > I installed my nslu2 a long time ago and there was a few new kernel > > versions available, which I also se in my /boot directory. > > > > Today I try to install a newer one using flash-kernel. But after restart > > nslu cannot find the harddisk. > > Do you have a serial consol

Re: Newer kernel for nslu2

2006-10-29 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Michael Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-29 14:57]: > I installed my nslu2 a long time ago and there was a few new kernel > versions available, which I also se in my /boot directory. > > Today I try to install a newer one using flash-kernel. But after restart > nslu cannot find the harddisk. Do

Newer kernel for nslu2

2006-10-29 Thread Michael Ott
Hi! I installed my nslu2 a long time ago and there was a few new kernel versions available, which I also se in my /boot directory. Today I try to install a newer one using flash-kernel. But after restart nslu cannot find the harddisk. Maybe one can help me CU Michael