Re: xulrunner 1.8.0.7-1

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:59:33AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060929 11:28]: > > Hi, > > > > I changed the build dependencies on xulrunner in 1.8.0.7-1 so that it could > > build despite arm lack of some java stuff. That involved putting the java > > dependenc

Re: xulrunner 1.8.0.7-1

* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060929 11:28]: > Hi, > > I changed the build dependencies on xulrunner in 1.8.0.7-1 so that it could > build despite arm lack of some java stuff. That involved putting the java > dependencies in Build-Depends-Indep. > > Now, I see that arm is still Dep-Waiting f

Re: ongoing build problems with fityk on arm

On 06-09-28 21:49 -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Wookey wrote: > > >On 06-09-17 10:52 -0500, Carlo Segre wrote: > >> > >>The question is this. Is fityk really a package that is useful for the > >>arm architecture? Only those who use arm can tell me this. If it isn't > >>maybe

xulrunner 1.8.0.7-1

Hi, I changed the build dependencies on xulrunner in 1.8.0.7-1 so that it could build despite arm lack of some java stuff. That involved putting the java dependencies in Build-Depends-Indep. Now, I see that arm is still Dep-Waiting for gjdoc for xulrunner. WTF ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email