Re: important application

2006-01-03 Thread pmr
nos bureaux seront fermés du 23 décembre au 5 janvier. votre message est enregistré. nous vous répondrons dans les meilleurs délais. meilleurs voeux à tous. Eldorado and c°... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Hector Oron
On 1/3/06, Gabriel Paubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,it's my first post to this list, but I've been lurkingfor a while. Bienvenido ! Welcome to the list ! I'm really interested in upgrading since the distributionI originally used (Linux/PPC) has been abandoned. However some  capabilit

Re: [I386-uclibc-devel] Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Bernhard Fischer
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:02:40PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: >> I would love to stand up a fully-working armel-uclibc port, or at least >> get the essential and build-essential packages running. I use >> debootstrap, so lack of an installer wouldn't be a problem. > >The same case for me. But w

Re: [I386-uclibc-devel] Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 03:02:40PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Em Ter, 2006-01-03 às 08:16 -0600, Bill Gatliff escreveu: > > I would love to stand up a fully-working armel-uclibc port, or at least > > get the essential and build-essential packages running. I use > > debootstrap, so lack of an in

Re: [I386-uclibc-devel] Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Ter, 2006-01-03 às 08:16 -0600, Bill Gatliff escreveu: > So many important topics, so little time! *sigh*... Unfortunally I have to agree... > > * prepare uclibc ports [4] > Sadly, I'm not a DD (yet) but I could definitely get behind this > proposal. Not only does it benefit embedded in a BI

Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Bill Gatliff
Guys: * promote DEBUILD_OPTIONS=nodocs flag for not building docs Stupid question, but it be more appropriate to promote separate *-doc packages instead? b.g. -- Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Gabriel Paubert
Hi, it's my first post to this list, but I've been lurking for a while. On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:17:41PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > Hi, > > emDebian development is again a bit staganting. One option to fuel > some fire is to have a worksession[0] at Extremadura[1][2]. Very nice plac

Re: Arm Buildds and developer machines

2006-01-03 Thread Bill Gatliff
Wookey: Wookey wrote: Yours seems the best offer for the LE machine so please set it up, and tell this list when it's installed. Any idea when this could happen? Well, this week is a tough one to get any work done in the USA. :) Does some time the week of January 2nd work? That

Re: Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Bill Gatliff
Riku: So many important topics, so little time! * prepare uclibc ports [4] Sadly, I'm not a DD (yet) but I could definitely get behind this proposal. Not only does it benefit embedded in a BIG way, but it also keeps Debian relevant on the class of machines that will likely be used in

Embeddded Debian meetup @ Extremadura

2006-01-03 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi, emDebian development is again a bit staganting. One option to fuel some fire is to have a worksession[0] at Extremadura[1][2]. Some ideas of things that could get done at or before emDebian worksession: * bring Ed's framework upto date with Etch. * create configurations for various devices