At Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:46:23 +0100,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >Non-free package, needs builds on arm and s390 to get the update into
> >testing. Volunteers?
>
> Building now on arm while we briefly have a machine not building
> anything else.
Wow, you're faster than me just 4 minutes. :)
I remove
Hi,
At Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:52:55 -0700,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Package: spim
> > Version: 6.3-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: sarge
> Non-free package, needs builds on arm and s390 to get the update into
> testing. Volunteers?
I'll do it for arm.
(I wonder why aba's wanna-build DB for non
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:52:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:02:35PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
>> Package: spim
>> Version: 6.3-1
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: sarge
>
>> When building 'spim' in a clean 'testing' chroot,
>> I get the following error:
>
>> debian/
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:02:35PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: spim
> Version: 6.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sarge
> When building 'spim' in a clean 'testing' chroot,
> I get the following error:
> debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
> make: dh_testdir: Command not found
> make: ***
Greetings! And thanks again for looking into this! GCL is the lisp
which builds acl2 -- its listed there in the build-depends, no?
Surely no other platform could autobuild otherwise?
Take care,
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> D'oh! FTBFS: at the start of debian/rules build I get
D'oh! FTBFS: at the start of debian/rules build I get
rm -f TAGS
rm -f workxxx
echo '(load "init.lsp")' > workxxx
echo '(acl2::make-tags)' >> workxxx
echo '(acl2::exit-lisp)' >> workxxx
gcl < workxxx
/bin/sh: gcl: command not found
make[1]: *** [TAGS] Error 127
What's gcl? Incomplete build-depe
Thank you! Please let me know when an upload of 2.9.2 can proceed as
far as arm goes without spoiling the work done so far for 2.9.1 on
testing.
Take care,
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll take care of it on ARM.
>
> On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 12:02 -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
>
I'll take care of it on ARM.
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 12:02 -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! Please excuse the long cc list, but I've written about
> this several times already over the past few months with no response.
> The arm buildd is stuck in the 'building' state of acl2, and the sparc
Greetings! Please excuse the long cc list, but I've written about
this several times already over the past few months with no response.
The arm buildd is stuck in the 'building' state of acl2, and the sparc
buildd has not uploaded the successfully built acl2. This situation
has persisted since sh
9 matches
Mail list logo
