On tis, 2003-12-30 at 21:34, Ron Golan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:36:39PM -0500, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:13:21PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >
> > > I had major stability problems when I tried 2.4.19 on my Netwinder (like
> > > uptimes in hours, vs. month
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 13:36, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:13:21PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > I had major stability problems when I tried 2.4.19 on my Netwinder (like
> > uptimes in hours, vs. months with 2.4.16). The main kernel-related
> > things I'm doing with it
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:36:39PM -0500, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:13:21PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > I had major stability problems when I tried 2.4.19 on my Netwinder (like
> > uptimes in hours, vs. months with 2.4.16). The main kernel-related
> > things I'm
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:13:21PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> I had major stability problems when I tried 2.4.19 on my Netwinder (like
> uptimes in hours, vs. months with 2.4.16). The main kernel-related
> things I'm doing with it are using the Debian ipmasq package and running
> X in a ch
On Sun, 2003-12-28 at 16:49, Stefan Wuerthner wrote:
> Are there any advantages/pitfalls in performing an update to either
>
> 2.4.16,
> 2.4.19
I had major stability problems when I tried 2.4.19 on my Netwinder (like
uptimes in hours, vs. months with 2.4.16). The main kernel-related
things I'm d
Hi,
it seems that all Debian ARM machines are still down, according to
https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi. I would like to look into the
build failure of fftw3 on ARM (bug #223601), is there a possibility to
get an account on some ARM and the build dependencies of fftw3
installed? And is there any
6 matches
Mail list logo
