Re: Motorola MX1ADS and Intel PXA250

2002-08-30 Thread Bradley A. Singletary
see www.arm.linux.org.uk for supported pxa250 development boards We had good luck with both the Accelent IDP and the Intel Lubbock boards. Bradley A. Singletary Applications Developer 4Access Communications Phone: (770)475-9060 Fax: (770)475-2485 On Thu, 29 Au

Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your architecture

2002-08-30 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Jonathan Amery wrote: >Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:58:43 +0100 >From: Jonathan Amery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-x@lists.debian.org >Subject: Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your >architecture > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> B

Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your architecture

2002-08-30 Thread Jonathan Amery
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Branden writes: >> I can't believe he actually intends to keep it like this.. >I'm going to #define DEV_RANDOM /dev/random for Linux systems. And Debian Hurd? Or does the Hurd not have /dev/random or /dev/urandom? I suspect that /dev/urandom may be the better cho

Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your architecture

2002-08-30 Thread Jonathan Amery
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kusti writes: >I believe the /dev/mem gets read only in systems where no /dev/(u)random >exists. Actually, the standard configuration is that /dev/mem is read. The code to read from /dev/(u)random isn't activated in any situation in the standard upstream X distrib

Re: a small C program to test xdm's /dev/mem reading on your architecture

2002-08-30 Thread Jonathan Amery
[Apologies to readers of debian-sparc, who have already received a copy of this] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] write: [XDM randomness] >/dev/random? /dev/urandom? You are kidding. This randmomness is used >to create authorisation cookies for X which in my understanding provide