You appear to have skimmed over my explanations rather quickly. Your
main disagreement seems to concern our refusal to recognize a platform
not officially supported. I have explained some of our reasons.
> please understand where we are coming from, as porters for Debian we
> try to get all the
> A little less ignorance and little more tolerance might prove more
> helpful to us all.
indeed
> There is very little that depends on platform recognition. (1) a
so, by your own admission, there's no good reason to assume things do
not work. of the thousands of packages that we've built on
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:17:10PM +0200, Denys Duchier wrote:
>> Unfortunately, since noone volunteered to help for arm and hppa, these
>> platforms will remain unsupported and I must now remove recognition
>> for them from ozplatform.
>
> You are wron
Due to the breakage involved with libdb3's symbol versioning in
libdb3-3.2.9-15, libraries compiled against this version are almost
useless for building against. For example,
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&stamp=1019317098&ver=0.99.5%2Bcvs.2002.04.17-1&pkg=abiword&arch=arm&act=updpkg
shows
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:17:10PM +0200, Denys Duchier wrote:
> Unfortunately, since noone volunteered to help for arm and hppa, these
> platforms will remain unsupported and I must now remove recognition
> for them from ozplatform.
You are wrong to test for platform. It makes everybodys job har
Unfortunately, since noone volunteered to help for arm and hppa, these
platforms will remain unsupported and I must now remove recognition
for them from ozplatform.
Cheers,
--
Dr. Denys Duchier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forschungsbereich Programmiersysteme(Programming Systems L
6 matches
Mail list logo