Re: Binutils no longer autobuilding the cross-compiling packages...

2001-04-17 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Excellent! The long binutils compiles were triggering a bug in the Hurd, > causing a crash, so I had to remove it from the autobuilder. I will > add it back in now. Thanks for letting me know this. All the more reason to get cross-compiling situated a

Re: Binutils no longer autobuilding the cross-compiling packages...

2001-04-17 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:04:31PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > I'm removing the cross-compiler patches to debian/rules, etc. as > of the upcoming 2.11.90.0.5-1. Until we get a better method for compiling > these, I'd rather not have the packages available. As it stands, it takes > se

Binutils no longer autobuilding the cross-compiling packages...

2001-04-17 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
Just wanted to announce this... I'm removing the cross-compiler patches to debian/rules, etc. as of the upcoming 2.11.90.0.5-1. Until we get a better method for compiling these, I'd rather not have the packages available. As it stands, it takes several hours to build binutils and all of the cro

Bug#94249: pvm fails to run on ARM

2001-04-17 Thread Alexander Schulz
Package: pvm Version: 3.4.2-5 Severity: important Hello, the newer Versions of pvm (3.4.2-4, 3.4.2-5) finally include the ARM architecture again. But one important part of the patch was left out, so it will compile but never run: 14:09:34 shark:~>pvm can't generate signature for my integer byte