Re: Small syntax error in postgresql 7.0.3 for arm

2001-04-11 Thread Chris Gorman
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Hello, > > I used your diff, and it built fine, but dh_perl didn't generate a > perl:Depends line in libpgperl.substvars so that package failed to > build. Which is okay for me, as I just needed postgresql-dev as a > build-dep for something else...

Re: Small syntax error in postgresql 7.0.3 for arm

2001-04-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello, I used your diff, and it built fine, but dh_perl didn't generate a perl:Depends line in libpgperl.substvars so that package failed to build. Which is okay for me, as I just needed postgresql-dev as a build-dep for something else... But could postgresql perhaps need another Build-Depends?

Re: Bug#85629: please add acorn/ps2.uk keymap

2001-04-11 Thread Philip Blundell
>There are also a load of other riscos machines that could run >Debian (the RiscStation already does, for example). This doesn't matter. The RiscPC is the only machine for which there are actually kernels in the field with this wacky mapping. Any new ports that use PC keyboards, like RiscStati

Re: Bug#85629: please add acorn/ps2.uk keymap

2001-04-11 Thread Philip Blundell
>Should it really be "acorn" and not "riscpc" ? Given that this is a hackish translation of the PC keymap, "riscpc" seems appropriate. If and when Debian gains proper support for the other Acorn machines, we will deal with them by some other means. p.

Re: Bug#85629: please add acorn/ps2.uk keymap

2001-04-11 Thread Wookey
On Wed 11 Apr, Yann Dirson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:35:33PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > > >* this seems to imply that the ARM port needs to distinguish between > > >sub-archs, just as ppc and 68k > > Yes. As far as keyboard maps are concerned, there are only two flavours: > > most

debussy up again

2001-04-11 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi, sorry, wasn't at work yesterday. anyway, it's up again due to a loose power cable. probably caused by me ... sad, the uptime is gone ... so long Othmar

Re: unrecognizable insn building php4

2001-04-11 Thread Philip Blundell
> 2290 (insn 825 824 314 (set (reg:SI 0 r0) > 2291 (umin:SI (reg/v:SI 0 r0) > 2292 (const_int 8192 [0x2000]))) -1 (nil) > 2293 (nil)) > 2294 make[4]: *** [dns.lo] Error 1 > >I can hack around in dns.c, but IIRC the last time I got an insn error >(sendmail), it was