Branden Robinson wrote:
>So, alpha, arm, and m68k, *stop the presses*. You can build this version,
>but it's going to be a little buggy, and it will not be the last one you
>have to build for a while. There will be a 4.0.2-13.
Since medusa had already spent 23 hours or so grinding away at -12, I
[Not only Overfiend wants to spam, me too Please be careful when
replying to this mail.]
Packages listed below need a recompile for some architectures.
Could these be issued? Since they'll have to go into stable
please ensure that you build them on a stable machine.
Further investigation
---
[sorry for the wide CC; please note the Reply-To header]
Predictably, my efforts to create a synchonization point for XFree86 blew
up in my face.
So, alpha, arm, and m68k, *stop the presses*. You can build this version,
but it's going to be a little buggy, and it will not be the last one you
hav
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:42:02PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >I can rebuild it (maybe tommorow, since it takes some time) once the
> >build-depends of ocaml are installed (that would be tcl/tk 8.3-dev, and not
> >the currently installed tcl/tk 8.0 -dev.
>
> I've installed the 8.3 packages on
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:42:02PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >I can rebuild it (maybe tommorow, since it takes some time) once the
> >build-depends of ocaml are installed (that would be tcl/tk 8.3-dev, and not
> >the currently installed tcl/tk 8.0 -dev.
>
> I've installed the 8.3 packages on
>I can rebuild it (maybe tommorow, since it takes some time) once the
>build-depends of ocaml are installed (that would be tcl/tk 8.3-dev, and not
>the currently installed tcl/tk 8.0 -dev.
I've installed the 8.3 packages on medusa now. Try it again at your leisure.
p.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:26:25PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > While packaging ocaml 3.01 for debian, i received the following bug report
> > from the arm porters.
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/luther/ocaml-3.01/otherlibs/labltk/lib'
> > ../../../boot/ocamlrun ..
Just cross posting to the debian arm list and Philip Blundell.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:26:25PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > While packaging ocaml 3.01 for debian, i received the following bug report
> > from the arm porters.
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/luthe
hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:09:10AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >Or maybe it would be possible to have a chrooted unstable environment on
> >arm.debian.org, like it is done on other debian boxes ?
> Yes, I think debussy's maintainer is looking into that.
didn't know that arm was pointing t
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:43:26AM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >we need to make sure that the native code compiler don't make use of these
> >extra instructions though. from a quick glance at ocaml-3.01/asmrun/arm.S, i
> >don't think that is so, after all this file is pretty short, but then i k
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:43:26AM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >we need to make sure that the native code compiler don't make use of these
> >extra instructions though. from a quick glance at ocaml-3.01/asmrun/arm.S, i
> >don't think that is so, after all this file is pretty short, but then i k
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:43:26AM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >we need to make sure that the native code compiler don't make use of these
> >extra instructions though. from a quick glance at ocaml-3.01/asmrun/arm.S, i
> >don't think that is so, after all this file is pretty short, but then i k
>Ocaml 3.01-2 (older version, since i had already downloaded it there) builds
>fine on arm.debian.org. I understand that this is a potato box, is it possible
>for me to log in a arm box running unstable to test this divers things ?
Sure, just mail me a username and crypted password and I will set
>1) did you look at the /tmp/camlasm2.s file ?
>
>2) Where can i find the build daemon log, to report this upstream ?
>
>3) What should i do now, because of this bug, ocaml will never enter testing,
>and it is not something i can fix. Is it ok if i disable the native code
>compiler for arm until th
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:43:26AM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >we need to make sure that the native code compiler don't make use of these
> >extra instructions though. from a quick glance at ocaml-3.01/asmrun/arm.S, i
> >don't think that is so, after all this file is pretty short, but then i k
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:43:26AM +, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >we need to make sure that the native code compiler don't make use of these
> >extra instructions though. from a quick glance at ocaml-3.01/asmrun/arm.S, i
> >don't think that is so, after all this file is pretty short, but then i k
16 matches
Mail list logo
