[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#90878: O: libfloat -- Soft floating point library]

2001-03-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I'm forwarding this since the package is arm specific. Does anyone has interest in it? - Forwarded message from Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#90878: O: libf

instructions (help) setting up buildd for arm

2001-03-23 Thread Chris Gorman
Hey, I'm trying to setup buildd on my systems and have a few questions about how to set it up in my environment. I tried to contact Phil Blundell directly about doing this, but he has yet to respond to my mail. (In all fairness my mail was rather weak and didn't pose decent questions. Hopefully

Re: libssl 0.9.4

2001-03-23 Thread Michael Schmitz
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: > Could someone from each of these arches (arm, m68k and powerpc) please > compile openssl094 and/or rebuild any packages currently linked against > libssl09 so they're linked against libssl0.9.6 instead? Anthony, I'll start a rebuild for m68k (the autobu

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-23 Thread Philip Blundell
>we need to make sure that the native code compiler don't make use of these >extra instructions though. from a quick glance at ocaml-3.01/asmrun/arm.S, i >don't think that is so, after all this file is pretty short, but then i know >nothing about arm assembly. Could you please look at it (it is 338

Re: libssl 0.9.4

2001-03-23 Thread Philip Blundell
Anthony Towns wrote: >Could someone from each of these arches (arm, m68k and powerpc) please >compile openssl094 and/or rebuild any packages currently linked against >libssl09 so they're linked against libssl0.9.6 instead? I've uploaded openssl094 to pandora. p.

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-23 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 08:58:33AM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > >Now, i have looked at this bug, saw that the upstream package checks for > >sa110 > >and armv4l, but rejects anything else. I have added armv3l support in the > >3.01-4 version of this package, but as the ocaml package generate ma

Re: difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-23 Thread Philip Blundell
>Now, i have looked at this bug, saw that the upstream package checks for sa110 >and armv4l, but rejects anything else. I have added armv3l support in the >3.01-4 version of this package, but as the ocaml package generate machine >code, maybe there is a reason for the armv3l subarch not being suppo

difference between armv3l and armv4l, ...

2001-03-23 Thread Sven LUTHER
Hello, ... some days ago, i received a serious bug report (90089) against one of my package (ocaml, a ml implementation with a native code compiler). The report was from Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and complained that the package did not support the armv3l subarchitecture. Now, i have looke