Re: buildd pages

2001-03-21 Thread Richard Atterer
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 08:00:06AM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > No: try > > for example. I imagine lilo genuinely isn't in the database; it's > i386 only. Ah, of course. On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 10:49:49AM +, Philip Blu

Re: buildd pages

2001-03-21 Thread Philip Blundell
> returns an >empty file - does that mean that nothing in testing is currently >delayed by arm alone, or that the buildd is broken? :) The hall of shame is working again now; it currently contains 131 packages. I'd urge anybody who has ti

Re: buildd pages

2001-03-21 Thread Philip Blundell
Richard Atterer wrote: >I realised that and tried doing it that way, but e.g. > gives >"I can't find package lilo_arm in the database." Looks like you *must* >also needs a version number, which is not practical. No: try

Re: compiler broken

2001-03-21 Thread Tor Slettnes
> "Bdale" == Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bdale> Ok, so I was trying to build something on my Netwinder that Bdale> needed pieces not already installed, so I freshened it to Bdale> latest sid. In the process, I seem to have broken my Bdale> ability to compile anyth