Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?

2001-03-08 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Philip Blundell wrote: > I think ARM is okay at the moment; almost all the packages that are unbuilt > have > actually failed, so human intervention is what's needed rather than machine > cycles. Alpha looks like maybe it could benefit from an autobuilder, and I > do > a

Re: more __gmon_start__ afflictions

2001-03-08 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls writes: >Is there any identifier I can look for to check for any other broken >binaries on my system, with the misbehaving binutils? If "objdump -R" reveals that the only reloc involving __gmon_start__ is an R_ARM_GLOB_DAT, you are OK. If there is an

Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?

2001-03-08 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve McIntyre writes : >I've got a full mirror sat around at home at the moment, and a cable >modem sat idle for significant amounts of time. I know the m68k >buildds are struggling to keep up at the moment; are any of the other >arches in a similar position? I'd lo