Re: gpg fails!

2001-02-17 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Adam C Powell IV wrote: > I'm currently building 1.0.4-2, but if -1 doesn't work, then is there hope for > -2? Maybe when it's built with the new compiler/toolchain? Nope, -2 fails in the same way... :-( I'll keep building packages, and debsign their .changes and upload all at once when gpg wor

gpg fails!

2001-02-17 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello, The current gpg binary in unstable (1.0.4-1) isn't working for me, on a Netwinder with a 2.4.1 kernel from lkab. I just tried to sign a .changes for a binary upload, and it asked for the passphrase thrice and failed. Then I tried verifying a detached sig I had made on an Intel box, which

Re: m68k buildd presents significant problem for non-us and testing

2001-02-17 Thread Christoph Martin
Sam Hartman writes: > Looking at incoming/DONE on pandora, it looks as if m68k buildd has > not built packages for non-us since January 10. This means that > packages uploaded since January 10 with m68k support have not made it > into testing. I'm not really sure that buildd for m68k even bui

page fault in mkfontdir

2001-02-17 Thread Peter Naulls
I'm seeing this: Feb 17 14:41:32 bug kernel: mkfontdir: unhandled page fault at pc=0x, lr =0x40050bd4 (bad address=0x, code 0) Feb 17 14:41:57 bug last message repeated 9 times Which afflicts itself during install of xfont packages - I've filed a bug against one of the xfont pac