Re: compiler broken

2001-02-09 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls writes: > >You don't say what kernel you're using, but the current GCC certainly > >has a problem on 2.2.16-rmk3 kernels. You could try 2.4, or downgrade > >GCC as P

Re: compiler broken

2001-02-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Philip Blundell wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls writes: > >You don't say what kernel you're using, but the current GCC certainly > >has a problem on 2.2.16-rmk3 kernels. You could try 2.4, or downgrade > >GCC as Phil suggested. > > I'm pretty confident the kernel isn't at f

Re: compiler broken

2001-02-09 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls writes: >You don't say what kernel you're using, but the current GCC certainly >has a problem on 2.2.16-rmk3 kernels. You could try 2.4, or downgrade >GCC as Phil suggested. I'm pretty confident the kernel isn't at fault here. But, if people want to

Re: compiler broken

2001-02-09 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bdale Garbee) wrote: > Ok, so I was trying to build something on my Netwinder that needed pieces not > already installed, so I freshened it to latest sid. In the process, I seem to > have broken my ability to compile anything at all. Th

Re: compiler broken

2001-02-09 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philip Blundell writes: >It does seem that the current cpp is broken. I don't know how this happened, >offhand. Try downgrading cpp-2.95 to an earlier version. Belay that; in fact it appears that the breakage is caused by libc6_2.2.1-1. Backing out to libc6 2.2

Re: compiler broken

2001-02-09 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bdale Garbee writes: >Ok, so I was trying to build something on my Netwinder that needed pieces not >already installed, so I freshened it to latest sid. In the process, I seem to >have broken my ability to compile anything at all. The failure is always a >signal 11

Re: Building openssh

2001-02-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Greetings, > > I just tried to build openssh, but it died with "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find > -ldb". So I looked in sid/Contents-arm.gz, which showed /usr/lib/libdb.so in > libdb2-dev. But when I installed libdb2-dev, no /usr/lib/libdb.so! My mistake: I have woody install

compiler broken

2001-02-09 Thread Bdale Garbee
Ok, so I was trying to build something on my Netwinder that needed pieces not already installed, so I freshened it to latest sid. In the process, I seem to have broken my ability to compile anything at all. The failure is always a signal 11 in cpp, the simplest test case I've found is 'cpp -v' wh

Building openssh

2001-02-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Greetings, I just tried to build openssh, but it died with "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb". So I looked in sid/Contents-arm.gz, which showed /usr/lib/libdb.so in libdb2-dev. But when I installed libdb2-dev, no /usr/lib/libdb.so! Any ideas? -Adam P. GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C

svga lib (for svnc)

2001-02-09 Thread pankaj
Hi, I am trying to run svncviewer (vncviewer without X) using SVGA libs on CLPS7500FE board(ARM processor). SVGA libs are downloaded from debian binary-arm directory. Can anybody please tell me about the libvga.config file for specifying the monitor configuration. I couldnt find one in my f