Right - I'm sitting here installing arm debian atm, and I'm going to type
bugs into here as I find them (any that seem to be package rather than
arch I'll report normally).
drivers.tgz and images-1.44 need to be renamed 'drivers.tg*' and
'images-1.4*' to work.
debconf depends on perl-5.005 an
Well, these lists have been in existence for as long as I've had access to
the mailing list server. I changed the sparc buildd to use them, and I'm
hoping that the other ports will follow along. Right now these ports have
lists for "debian--changes" (stable) and
"debian-devel--changes" (unstable an
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >I have some questions:
> >1. Are the Linux/arm machines all called "armv4l"?
>
> No, you should match on just `arm*'. "armv4l" happens to be the most common,
> but many others are possible.
I've changed this.
>...
> >3. Is this patch all right?
>
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chen.de>, Adrian Bunk writes:
>I have some questions:
>1. Are the Linux/arm machines all called "armv4l"?
No, you should match on just `arm*'. "armv4l" happens to be the most common,
but many others are possible.
>2. Why does config.guess report *-linux-gnu instead
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Package: mtools
> Version: 3.9.6-3.1
>
> On my ARM system (Acorn RISC PC, StrongARM, kernel 2.2.16-rmk3, libc
> 2.1.3-13), issuing a command such as "mcopy" or "mdir" gives the error:
>
> Mtools has not been correctly compiled
> Recompile it using a more
>By itself this is pretty odd, but #56 is simply not defined in
>/usr/include/elf.h at all. I am rebuilding right now (a 10-hour
>process) with "Elf_Rel" rather than "Elf_Rela" setup, to see if that
>makes a difference. (Seing that ARM, like i386, unlike any of the
>other processors, is Little En
6 matches
Mail list logo
