Curses, I accidentally uploaded all those packages to woody rather than
potato. I'll try again tomorrow.
p.
hi,
> I'm hoping Chris will get time to upload the newer arm-port page I did soon.
> If anyone else has the authority (I'm mouldering in the NM queue) it's sat at
> http://www.aleph1.co.uk/armlinux/debian/arm.html
> please feel free...at least make it look like we're doing something :-)
i downlo
These packages are now in `incoming' on non-us.
apache-ssl_1.3.9.13-2_arm.changes
cfs_1.3.3-8_arm.changes
fsh_1.0.post.1-2.1_arm.changes
lynx-ssl_2.8.3.1-1_arm.changes
netkit-telnet-ssl_0.16.3-1_arm.changes
openssh_1.2.3-9_arm.changes
openssl_0.9.4-5_arm.changes
pipsecd_19990511-18_arm.changes
ssl
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 11:23:18PM -0800, Tor Slettnes wrote:
> The problem is specifically `non-us' packages. I would if I could,
> but I cannot and so I will not.
> If I were to compile and upload ssh, I would be subject to the same
> legal status as one who has obtain nuclear secrets and s
Based on the name, I assumed you were in Scandinavia or something;
from whois, though, it looks like you're in California. That means
you're just uninformed :-)
First of all, it has been several years since crypto was restricted as
weaponry; it changed to be restricted as crypto.
Second, in Janu
>i was just today confirmed that there were just 2 packages
>uploaden in last weeks/months (don't know for sure but something like
>this was told me this evening).
There were 178 updated ARM packages in 2.2r1. For the stable distribution,
pretty much everything quinn-diff lists as not built is
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >For that matter, is the arm port primarily a netwinder port, or more
> >broad?
>
> It's more broad. All ARM machines should be binary-compatible with the
> Debian
> packages, at least within reason (no big-endian, no ARM2).
Sure seems to work, I
> "Othmar" == Othmar Pasteka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Othmar> i thought there were quite a few careing about the
Othmar> port. anyway, i and one other debian developer think it's
Othmar> time to do something.
The problem is specifically `non-us' packages. I would if I could,
>For that matter, is the arm port primarily a netwinder port, or more
>broad?
It's more broad. All ARM machines should be binary-compatible with the Debian
packages, at least within reason (no big-endian, no ARM2).
p.
9 matches
Mail list logo
