Re: Debian-arm webpage

2000-09-26 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK Jim, I'm back from hols and I'm happy to do this. I see no-one else has > > fixed it yet. Were there any other volunteers? > > Hi, > > Both Chris Rutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Peter Naulls > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Debian-arm webpage

2000-09-26 Thread Jim Pick
Wookey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue 12 Sep, Jim Pick wrote: > > Hi, > > > The debian-arm webpage is in a horrible non-maintained state (I last > > updated on January 20, 1999). > > > http://www.debian.org/ports/arm/ > > > It makes the whole port look like it's dead, which it obviously

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

2000-09-26 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > The new gcc package build failed on Alpha during stage1 of the gpc > build. I can try eliminating gpc from the build for now (allowing me to > continue to get the new glibc stuff working), if that's an > option... This probably doesn't have

util-linux from potato doesn't build

2000-09-26 Thread Chris Rutter
Um, does anyone have any idea how util-linux got into potato? fdisk doesn't build on ARM... If there was an NMU, the patch didn't make its way back to the maintainer. :-( c.

Re: Debian-arm webpage

2000-09-26 Thread Wookey
On Tue 12 Sep, Jim Pick wrote: > Hi, > The debian-arm webpage is in a horrible non-maintained state (I last > updated on January 20, 1999). > http://www.debian.org/ports/arm/ > It makes the whole port look like it's dead, which it obviously isn't. > Does anybody want to redo it? > I'd really

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

2000-09-26 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > Well, here it comes. Glibc 2.1.94, hot of the glibc release process. I'm > currently building i386, powerpc and sparc, which I will upload throughout > the day and tonight as I build them. These are going into woody. Several > notes for the other ports (t