Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Chris Baker wrote:
>
> > It builds okay without -fsigned-char. Now, instead of not printing
> > any fractional decimal places, it prints too many:
> >
> > 14.11000
> >
> > Still, better than nothing
>
> True. It's probably setting the precision to 127 or 255 now
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 02:44:12AM +0100, Chris Rutter wrote:
> > Skimming the source, it would seem another problem is where Xfbdev is
> > told to use the `default' mode and doesn't attempt to reset the virtual
> > height. What it really ought to do is take the mode param
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Is this the reason why you were finding that my patch didn't seem to work?
> (sorry, I forgot to say that I wasn't running in "default")
I'm totally guessing. This is based on a couple of off-hand thoughts
having spent five minutes staring at the sour
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 02:44:12AM +0100, Chris Rutter wrote:
> Skimming the source, it would seem another problem is where Xfbdev is
> told to use the `default' mode and doesn't attempt to reset the virtual
> height. What it really ought to do is take the mode parameters, unset
> text, and reset
4 matches
Mail list logo
