Re: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm

2000-09-10 Thread Philip Blundell
> ldr r3, [r3, #0] > ldr r3, [r3], #-4 > str r3, [fp, #-60] Hmm. Can you send me the .i file so I can try building it for myself? >be re-ordered to: > > ldr r1, .L1488+4 > str ip, [fp, #-56] > ldr r2, [r1, #0] > cmp ip, #0 >

gnucash: [PATCH] Fixed the "missing cents" bug

2000-09-10 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Greetings, First, the 1.4.5 gnucash upload did not fix bug 69866, involving all currencies rounding to the nearest integer on PPC (and I believe ARM). The problem is in src/engine/util.c line 401, where gnucash expects localeconv() to set the char fields of the lconv structure to CHAR_MAX. Of cou

Re: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm

2000-09-10 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 10:38:53PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > >/tmp/ccqBnxST.s: Assembler messages: > >/tmp/ccqBnxST.s:8196: Warning: destination register same as write-back base > > > >This would be a bad thing. This would appear to be the bad thing I had > >before with the previous (debian s

Re: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm

2000-09-10 Thread Philip Blundell
>/tmp/ccqBnxST.s: Assembler messages: >/tmp/ccqBnxST.s:8196: Warning: destination register same as write-back base > >This would be a bad thing. This would appear to be the bad thing I had >before with the previous (debian supplied) compiler. How (where) do I go >about working out if it's a known c

Re: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm

2000-09-10 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 04:41:39PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 04:50:51PM -0400, Chris Gorman wrote: > > I think you may be correct (at least on arm). If you are successfull with > > Phil's suggestion (building srpm gcc) post a report to the list. (I for > > one would l

Re: gcc 2.95.2-13 for arm

2000-09-10 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 04:50:51PM -0400, Chris Gorman wrote: > I think you may be correct (at least on arm). If you are successfull with > Phil's suggestion (building srpm gcc) post a report to the list. (I for > one would like to get an update on this.) I unpacked the SRPM on an x86 running