On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:50:42PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: apache-dev
> Version: 1.3.34-4.1
> Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
>
> Your package causes other packages to fail to build with GCC 4.3.
Since Apache 1.3 is not intended to release with Lenny, I don't think
it's worth fixing thi
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:56:17PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Same for apache 1.3 (including apache, apache-ssl, apache-perl); it too
> will soon disappear from sid and lenny. There are currently only a
> handful of apache 1.3 module packages in sid, against which bugs will
> be filed, but th
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 05:24:37PM -0700, Tyler 'Crackerjack' MacDonald wrote:
> I can understand the kernel not knowing that the memory is no longer used
> if there was still a straggler process hanging onto it. But when there are
> no processes left to access it, why does this continue to happen
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 07:10:10AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> This thing has been discussed over and over. This is the last reference to
> it:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=211889&archive=yes
>
> Since setting AddDefaultCharset off can imply security problem we
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 04:41:28PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> The reason why i didn't change default setting is because all the internal
> error pages uses latin1 (AddDefaultCharset on) and i didn't want to create
> a discrepancy between the config and the internal pages.
I didn't real
severity 269019 wishlist
retitle 269019 Please package mod_bandwidth 2.0.5
thanks
There are two modules called mod_bandwidth. You're reading the
documentation for the one we don't ship. Were it not now only picoseconds
before sarge releases, I'd add the new mod_bandwidth, but we're planning
on
reassign 272686 wnpp
retitle 272686 RFP: mod_deflate
thanks
New modules should be packaged separately, not included.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 02:54:08PM +0100, Carl Johnstone wrote:
> Package: apache
> Version: 1.3.31-5
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Could this be included with the debian apache packa
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 01:20:44PM +0100, Peter Bredlöv wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just upgraded to the newest (-7) release. But now i can't start apache
> again, and i get this error in my error log:
>
> [Tue Nov 2 00:36:40 2004] [warn] make_sock: problem listening on port 80,
> filedescriptor (1069)
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 07:43:29AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> In the default configuration, web servers shall bind to localhost only
> (okay, that's are more general policy issue affecting all network
> services).
um, that's a completely separate Policy proposal; i don't think it helps
anyone
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 05:51:50PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> My apologise, but this patch produces FTBFS due to broken command-line options
> in gcc. I'm working on a fix and will send it RSN.
I'm not sure it's worth it. I remember a bug against Apache 1.3 saying
that we shouldn't include
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 06:04:11PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> - Someone proposed that it's easier to scrap it (ignoring the fact that I
> already provided a patch).
Not just easier. More standards-compliant.
> I hereby propose to replace the constant string "Debian GNU/Linux" with a
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 12:44:07AM +1000, VHCS Hosting wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you include mod_vhost_dbi, mod_dbi_pool and mod_log_sql into the reps...
> they will help many people using apache and mass vhosting.
Hi. We don't actually include all the apache modules in the apache
package; this would b
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:10:35PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Apache 2.2 has been released since November 2005...
O RLY?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=344072
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:19:52PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Dear Apache maintainers,
> I suppose that six years after the release of Apache 2 Etch will
> no longer ship with Apache 1?
We discussed that just the other day (which led to the most recent
upload). Apache 1.3 still has a use;
severity 385083 wishlist
merge 156972 385083
thanks
Seems like you didn't read bug 156972. You can try the version of
apache2 in experimental to get this problem fixed.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:47:08AM +0200, Mr. Zdeeck wrote:
> Maybe I'm just misinformed, but large files support (>2GB) doesn'
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:24:21PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 06:54:58AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > Jon, nobody has been able to reproduce this problem. Can you kindly test
> > again as we agreed?
>
> Worked out what it is, my GREP_OPTIONS environment variab
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 06:40:43PM -0500, Branden Moore wrote:
> >> With perl 5.8.2 moving into 'testing', mod_perl.so seems to be
> >>segfaulting. My solution was to build libapache-mod-perl from the
> >>debian sources, and apache seems to be working find now.
this bug's been reported a dozen t
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 05:22:47PM +0100, Eirik Bjarkøy wrote:
> Removing libapache-mod-perl ...
> Error: mod_accounting.so does not have a corresponding .info file.
You need to file a bug against the package that provides mod_accounting.
I don't know what package this is in.
--
"Next the state
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:27:11AM +0100, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
> Package: apache
> Version: 1.3.27.0-2.0.ipv6.r1
> Severity: normal
> Followup-For: Bug #225430
>
> Hi
>
> Yesterday I did my last apt-get upgrade. Since then Apache segfaulted.
> I've removed mod_perl as suggested in this report a
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 11:03:53AM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:05:17PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > But the root of the problem lies in gcc 3.0.4 since it is OK in 3.3.2. So
> > wouldn't it be easier to identify and backport the fix from 3.3.2 to 3.0.4
> > and infor
Sorry, this patch is useless to me. Please resend as a unified or
context diff (diff -u).
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:48:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Patch:
>
> 22a23
> > ENV="env -i LANG=${LANG} PATH=${PATH}"
> 32c33
> < start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 02:27:06PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Thanks
>
> And don't bother the whole list with this.
fwiw, I already forwarded this to the listad
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:59:56AM +1100, Andrew Greig wrote:
> After running 'strings' against mod_autoindex.so, then subsequently
> examining the apache .orig.tar.gz, showed that the standard mod_autoindex
> is not being used. Instead the mod_autoindex.c from apache-contrib-1.0.8a,
> which lacks
At some point Netgod forked mod_autoindex from upstream and added the
StudlyIndex option. That was fine until upstream added some features
and fixed some bugs. The plan is to turn the mod_autoindex in contrib
into a patch to the mod_autoindex distributed with apache.
Here is that patch. Commen
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 05:37:08AM -0600, Dave O wrote:
>
> Ok, it looks like rotatelogs (which is what I meant in my previous email)
> no longer comes with apache-common? In that case, it was apache
> attempting to open a pipe to a nonexistant program to log which hangs.
> Still think this is a
OK, now I understand what rotatelogs does, I've added it to apache-utils.
We used to ship it as part of apache-common, but it's more generally
useful than just for apache, so it makes sense to move it to apache-utils.
This bug is now tagged pending as it will be fixed by the next upload.
--
"Nex
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:29:28PM -0500, Bill Denney wrote:
> My system does not load apache and it does not write an error to the
> error log (/var/log/apache/error.log or to /var/log/messages). Upon
> restart, I get this in /var/log/apache/error/log:
>
> Processing config directory: /etc/apa
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 09:04:32PM -0800, Jeff Houlton wrote:
> Get me off your fuckin mailing list wouldya,, i have tried repeatedly to be
> removed and it doesnt work so fuck off with your shit,, thankyou.
why is it our fault you're too incompetent to read the headers which
tell you how to unsu
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 09:27:27PM +, Thom May wrote:
> > And the NameVirtualHost define file that i've made. began with an "-"
> > And the new version of Apache apparently couldn't handle that.
> > Thanks for the help!
>
> Ah, yeah. We've tightened up what gets included for safety's sake,
>
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 07:35:02AM +0100, Lars Tobias Borsting wrote:
> This is concerning tomcat4, I'm not sure if apache is the right mailing
> list. I'm using Debian unstable and would like to install the tomcat4
> package, but apt can't find it. I run:
>
> % apt-get install tomcat4
> Reading P
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 05:56:28PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> /etc/aliases is the source file for the system mail aliases (e.g.,
> postmaster, usenet, etc.), it is the one which the sysadmin and postinst
> scripts may edit. After /etc/aliases is edited the program or human
> editing it m
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 09:53:49AM -0400, William R. McDonough wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /bin]$ ls -aFl sh
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root4 May 10 09:42 sh -> bash*
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin]$ head -1 /usr/sbin/apachectl
> #!/bin/bash
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/sbin]$ apache
32 matches
Mail list logo
