Re: Debian: apu-config and BDB

2012-11-24 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Ben Reser] > It's an abuse of apu-config that's true. > > My understanding (as well as other SVN devs understanding) was that > we did this because we were concerned about potentially getting a > different version of BDB by way of APR-UTIL than what we were linked > against when we're run inside

Re: Debian: apu-config and BDB

2012-11-23 Thread Ben Reser
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > You are confusing two things here. Apr-util dbm is an abstraction for > key-value-type database libraries of which BDB is one possible > provider. > > Apr-util dbd (note the different order of the letters than bdb) is an > abstraction for sq

Re: Debian: apu-config and BDB

2012-11-23 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Thursday 22 November 2012, Ben Reser wrote: > Since the change that was made in reaction to this bug report: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622081 > > apu-config on Debian has avoided returning the BDB library from > --libs. The bug suggests that BDB is related to the DBM s