Hello Fabio,
On Mon, 19.06.2006 at 11:19:22 +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Toni Mueller wrote:
> > I'd say that making a "LAMP" package that includes a lot of PHP stuff
> > and not much else is sort of hijacking a good name for a bad purpose.
> >
> > lamp-python ("b
Thom May wrote:
> I don't see there's any benefit in doing this _at all_, to be honest. It'll
> just turn into a whine fest when people don't get exactly what they want
> installed, and it then just becomes an unmaintainable mess.
> -Thom
That's exactly why i don't want it in apache, and somebody
I don't see there's any benefit in doing this _at all_, to be honest. It'll
just turn into a whine fest when people don't get exactly what they want
installed, and it then just becomes an unmaintainable mess.
-Thom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'd say that making a "LAMP" package that includes a lot of PHP stuff
> and not much else is sort of hijacking a good name for a bad purpose.
>
> If anything, packages like
>
> lamp-python ("best" language)
> lamp-perl ("original" definition of LAMP)
> la
Hello,
I'd say that making a "LAMP" package that includes a lot of PHP stuff
and not much else is sort of hijacking a good name for a bad purpose.
If anything, packages like
lamp-python ("best" language)
lamp-perl ("original" definition of LAMP)
lamp-php
(in order of decreasing preferenc
5 matches
Mail list logo
