Adam Conrad wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > It has now, but if it's included in Etch it means that the Security Team
> > has to maintain it until at least June 2009. Historically most of
> > the vulnerabilities in Apache 1 applied to version 2 as well, so
> > it's twice the amount of work an
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> It has now, but if it's included in Etch it means that the Security Team
> has to maintain it until at least June 2009. Historically most of
> the vulnerabilities in Apache 1 applied to version 2 as well, so
> it's twice the amount of work and should only be done for goo
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Dear Apache maintainers,
> > I suppose that six years after the release of Apache 2 Etch will
> > no longer ship with Apache 1?
>
> We discussed that just the other day (which led to the most recent
> upload). Apache 1.3 still has a use; in particular, some software is
>
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:19:52PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Dear Apache maintainers,
> I suppose that six years after the release of Apache 2 Etch will
> no longer ship with Apache 1?
We discussed that just the other day (which led to the most recent
upload). Apache 1.3 still has a use;
Dear Apache maintainers,
I suppose that six years after the release of Apache 2 Etch will
no longer ship with Apache 1?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 matches
Mail list logo