it is smart enough to know whether
/etc/resolv.conf points at localhost or not, but if it's not, it should
be fixed so it'll DTRT here even if there's nothing providing $named.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
config in
/usr/share/doc/apache2/examples so people who use monit can integrate it
easily, but installing monit doesn't mean it'll suddenly start
restarting your apache just because you've moved it away from port 80,
for instance.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's j
moves the group on purge.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
/mods-available/php5.conf :
This file is not shipped by apache, but by php, so reassigning this bug.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
dspam packages, with one of the goal being
to move files away from
| /var/www
Moving to /srv/www will grant you an RC bug for a FHS violation, so
while we might want to reconsider what the default docroot should be for
a2-suexec, it's surely not going to be /srv/www.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UN
]] sistemas
severity 540016 normal
thanks
| Fails to install because of not using --force-badname when creating group
| ssl-cert. This is the install log:
What does «grep NAME_REGEX /etc/adduser.conf» return?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friend
]] Reuben Thomas
| On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > Given that /usr/share/images is not only used by web packages, I think
| > the answer is «no». Those packages should make sure to set up the
| > necessary aliases they need (or we could have something like
| > /usr
/usr/share/httpd/images that would be shipped in apache2.2-common and
which would be in the default config).
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
«Web servers, browsers,
proxies, download tools etc.», which Apache HTTPd very much is.
apache2-{prefork,threaded}-dev are priority extra since they conflict
with each other.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
be loaded on demand and not by
default, AIUI.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
like we would ignore problems with Mosaic, Netscape and so on.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
workaround the problem in
| the meantime.
Remove the startup links?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 1.0.14
This bug was fixed a little time ago; closing by han now:
ssl-cert (1.0.14) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated debconf translations:
- tr, thanks to Mehmet Türker (Closes: #417551)
-- Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:58:19 -0500
--
Tollef Fo
nd what seems to
| be the output of 'hostname -f'). Until now my setup always worked
| just fine. Am I doing something wrong and it worked fine until now
| just because of random luck or is the "hostname -f" change of
| ssl-cert causing unwanted problems? :)
I doubt it has anyt
l.cnf you are using.
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261349
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* "Nick Price"
| And in case it was missed, in my public_html directory there is a .htaccess
| file which contains the following:
| addhandler cgi-script .pl
Do you have Options ExecCGI for your cgi-bin directory too?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just pick
where the maintainer is
active. You NMU has so far cost me more than an hour's work of
cleanup. Please don't do that ever again.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's j
* Ken Bowley
| I am also seeing this bug and the error.log shows a segfault when
| attempting to load a file. Directory lists work fine.
Any chance any of you could provide an strace of a apache2 -X run on a
2.4 kernel when trying to serve a file?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
including new ones created today (4-October-2004).
You reported this bug ages ago, but I'm unable to reproduce this at
all on my setup here. Are you still able to reproduce this?
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friend
* Daan Willems
| Apache2 error.log shows: [client ] Invalid method in request
| \x16\x03\x01
This sounds like you're missing an SSLEnable for the vhost in
question. Can you please check that, and if not, send us the relevant
vhost config?
--
Tollef Fog
* Mike Bird
| In light of recent reports of symlinks being removed[1], and
| the statement that apache2.2 takes care of it if apache2 is
| *not* purged[2], is it now safe to purge apache2-common?
Should be. If not, it's a bug we'd very much like to get reported and
fixed.
--
Tolle
Thomas Schoepf skrev:
Then don't purge it before installing apache2.2. apache2.2-common
works around this.
How does it do that?
It does rm -f /var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2-common.postrm in its preinst.
As this seems to be an user error rather than an
error in the package, there's nothing we c
i in `find /etc/apache2 -type l`; do
| rm -f "$i"
| done
Then don't purge it before installing apache2.2. apache2.2-common
works around this. As this seems to be an user error rather than an
error in the package, there's nothing we can do to fix this. M
enabled? Note that the default configuration does
not run any CGI files outside of /usr/lib/cgi-bin, so if you accepted
the new conffiles, you might accidentially have gotten an «AddHandler
cgi-script .cgi» directive disabled.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
that a2dissite is not called as part of any of the maintainer
scripts for apache2.2-common, I somehow don't think the problem lies
with Apache here.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's j
* Stefan Schmidt
| On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:13:28PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > | And as i quoted below i guess someone just broke epoll detection.
| >
| > Yes, or rather, it doesn't do runtime detection. Recompile libapr1 or
| > use a 2.6 kernel.
|
| Peter Samuelson
ed to turn rude.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about
reassign 394714 libapr1
forcemerge 392049 394714
thanks
* David Muriel
| It seems that the problem is related to libapr1 when using a 2.4
| kernel, so maybe this bug should be reassigned to libapr1 and merged
| with those three.
Indeed. Thanks for helping.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
?
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who
he2
| package should depend on an implementation representative of the
| apache2 package's version.
Why would any package depend on apache (>= 2.2)?
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's
.0.55-4.1.
Yes, and? This isn't a bug, there is nothing in apache2's description
which says «this ensures you have the latest version of all apache2
packages installed», and there shouldn't either. Dependencies should
be as loose as possible, but no looser.
* Thibaut VARENE
| I'm trying to build libapache-mod-musicindex on my machine for apache2.
| This modules has been successfully built by the autobuilders, but here's
| what happens today:
use apr-util --cppflags, not just --cflags (or just use pkg-config)
--
Tolle
apache team
to backport that to sarge, which you seem to be running.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who
Marco Amadori skrev:
Alle 17:41, sabato 14 ottobre 2006, Tollef Fog Heen ha scritto:
If we can't determine whether port 80 is in use or not, we
assume it is.
So if /proc is not mounted you could just assume that port 80 is free and do
not fail the installation of package will be pos
Marco Amadori skrev:
But I think that it is not a clean way to proceed in a "create live
environment" sense of a package, /proc filesystem means the "current hardware
and kernel system" pack of informations and not a "generic debian system"
informations nor an "hardwareless" or "kernelless" pa
Marco Amadori skrev:
I can tell
you that it's not rocket science to get /proc mounted in your target
chroot while installing packages and then, y'know, unmount it when
you're done.
In fact we did an hack for having /proc mounted in debian-live, but the bug
regards also installing apache in ch
forcemerge 392049 392646
thanks
John Fry skrev:
Since I upgraded to apache2 on unstable, apache fails to start after
trying to spawn a bunch of child processes. Here's a snippet from
/var/log/apache2/error.log:
Known bug in apr; it doesn't work correctly with 2.4 kernels.
- tfheen
--
To
Olaf van der Spek skrev:
Hi,
I'm still getting the DSO error although the bug is supposed to be fixed.
Is there something trivial I missed (again)?
Your system is in a wedged state that apache can't get you out of. Just
chmod -x /usr/sbin/apache2 and the upgrade should work fine.
- tfheen
forcemerge 390786 391864
thanks
Moshe Yudkowsky skrev:
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This bug has already been fixed. _PLEASE_ look at the list of recently
closed bugs before filing new ones. Also, please make sure you use
* Madko
| now that apache2 has been upgraded successfully to apache2.2, web server
| cannot be started anymore:
Correct, this is a bug in the PHP package. It doesn't depend on the
proper ABI and a bug for this has been filed already.
--
Tollef Fog
Tyler MacDonald skrev:
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: libbtutil0
Severity: serious
Version: 0.0.19-1
Your package is not installable as it depends on libapr0 which is not
available in unstable anymore. You might want to update the dependency to
libapr1.
I know. :-( Unfortunatel
23834 exit signal Aborted (6)
This information is useless if you can't get us a backtrace. Please
try to do so.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about
less crackful than the alternatives, really.
Packaging apache has clearly scrambled my wits as well. :-)
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is us
Kostas Tzounopoulos skrev:
Ηi,
I updated some minutes ago my debian sid amd64 to find out that
libapache2-mod-php5 v5.1.6-3 is not compatible with the
apache2 v2.2.3-1 with
apache2.2-common v2.2.3-1
Correct, it's not compatible with the current version of apache in unstable.
apache2: Syntax
severity 390817 important
force-merge 390817 390785
thanks
Pierre Habouzit skrev:
says it all. I happen to version my /etc/ files under svn, hence the
loss that incured because it messed up with the .svn dirs in a bad way.
Please look at already-filed bugs before filing new bugs.
- tfheen
Steve McIntyre skrev:
I was doing some testing today using DVD images, and was surprised to
see that the apache2 in unstable still does not have LFS support. I
saw the same issue reported in #386024, and I can see #383774 asking
for LFS to be enabled. There is clearly no simple fix, as mentioned
Ramon M. Branquinho skrev:
apache2-mpm-prefork works fine and dandy
until you install:
libapache2-mod-perl2
libapache2-mod-php4
"/etc/init.d/apache2 stop" will freeze and wont kill any processes
I can't reproduce this. Can you please try again and see if you still
see the problem? If s
an be currently done with apache
| 1.3 and 2.0).
Because there's no need to coinstall apache 2.0 and 2.2, we're not
going to take on the extra maintenance burden of maintaining three
different versions of apache. Two is quite enough.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
cheap and even more so on development systems.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just p
| another trivial edit to apu-config, to make --link-libtool say the same
| as --link-ld. I did not make that change.
Indeed, that'd be nice. ;-)
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about
ache
being started, so it makes sense for it to start late.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky
e2 has
| a stop priority of 91, which is quite high (the other daemons use the
| default of 20). Was there a reason for this? Will it stay there so that
| I can use e.g. 92?
It'll move to something lower, like 20, yes.
As for why it's 91 at the moment, see update-rc.d(8), particularly,
t
tables were corrupt. That is why from my
| perspective critical is the right severity.
That's a bug in mysql, then, feel free to adjust the severity of the
new bug, but this one against apache is not a critical bug.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,
severity 376503 minor
thanks
* Martin Gruner
| severity critical
No, it's not critical. It's minor or wishlist unless you can come up
with a non-contrived example where it can cause data loss.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,'&
* nieca-onet
[...]
| what I'm supoposed to do now?
Use a passwordless key?
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about
* Mohammed Adnène Trojette
| On Wed, Jun 14, 2006, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > I can't reproduce this. Where's the build log available?
| >
| > (I also somehow doubt this -- the configure call includes
| > --includedir=\$${prefix}/usr/include/apr-1.0 )
|
| AFAIK,
set x $ac_cv_target among other things).
This causes problems for apr-util since it needs to recover the
command line arguments through the APR_PARSE_ARGUMENTS macro.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just
* Julien Danjou
| There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
[...]
I can't reproduce this. Where's the build log available?
(I also somehow doubt this -- the configure call includes
--includedir=\$${prefix}/usr/include/apr-1.0 )
--
Tolle
:
You're not describing any bug here, and I can't find any package named
libpar.
If you'd start by telling us what you are seeing, what you expect to
be seeing and why you expect to be seeing that, it'd be a useful start.
7;t do that, then.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, i
onale
:
:
: [...]
:
: The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified
: as there is currently no consensus on how this should be done.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about
modules.
I've changed your request into a «Request for Packaging», so any
interested Debian Developers can look at it and optionally package it.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about
isted until 10 minutes elapses between
: requests. HEAD requests are ignored.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about
* Adam Rosi-Kessel
| This is a very strange, unreproducible problem that occurs frequently
| enough that I'm concerned.
This sounds like hardware failure. Have you tried running memtest86
on the system? (I saw you said it seems stable otherwise, but I'd
check that first.)
--
Tolle
k
Dependencies:
1:3.1.4-2 - libc6 (2 2.3.2.ds1-4)
Provides:
1:3.1.4-2 - awk
Reverse Provides:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ >
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
ost sarge). I suspect nobody will, though.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
* David Morse
| Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > * David Morse | abu:/var/cache/apt/archives# dpkg -i
| > apache_1.3.26-0woody3_i386.deb
| > | (Reading database ... 92942 files and directories currently installed.)
| > | Preparing to replace apache 1.3.26-0woody3 (using
a
* Wichert Akkerman
| Previously Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
| > can you test using apache2 2.0.48 and see if it still happens?
|
| Still happens with all apache packages at 2.0.48-4
Which mpm module are you using? I wonder if this is the same as
#202452.
--
Tollef Fog H
| potential upload date I may end up building new subversion debs and
| linking them with bdb 4.1, which I really would rather not do.
I broke the package uploaded two days ago, a fixed package should hit
incoming today. (It's building now.)
--
Tollef Fog
* Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
| I'd very much like to know how to fix this problem at this point.
Find the package on snapshot.debian.net.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
70 matches
Mail list logo
