[...@shanecurcuru.org: Interest in ApacheCon CFP for Debian folks?]

2008-03-12 Thread Martin Schulze
Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the loop. Regards, Joey - Forwarded message from Shane Curcuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:57:05 -0500 From: Shane Curcuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Interest in ApacheCon CFP for Debian folks? X-Folder

Bug#404598: SSL module only configured half

2006-12-26 Thread Martin Schulze
Package: apache2.2-common Version: 2.2.3-3.2 I guess that the file /etc/apache2/mods-available/ssl.conf is missing the statement "Listen 443" to allow Apache 2 to actually listen to the SSL port as well. Regards, Joey -- A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems.

Bug#315957: Info

2005-09-09 Thread Martin Schulze
FWIW: I've just tried to install, reinstall and upgrade apache-ssl inside a sarge chroot environment and the package didn't show problem. So maybe this bug is indeed due to the many virtual hosts. Michael should debug the postinst script, e.g. by executing it with "sh -x" or by creative glancing

Re: CAN-2005-1344: Buffer overflow in htdigest

2005-07-17 Thread Martin Schulze
Martin Schulze wrote: > Adam Conrad wrote: > > Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Are you aware of this: > > > > > > > > > http://www.lucaercoli.it/advs/htdigest.txt > > > http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5EP061FEKC.html > > > http://cve.m

Re: CAN-2005-1344: Buffer overflow in htdigest

2005-04-29 Thread Martin Schulze
Adam Conrad wrote: > Martin Schulze wrote: > > Are you aware of this: > > > > > > http://www.lucaercoli.it/advs/htdigest.txt > > http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5EP061FEKC.html > > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1344 > > We

CAN-2005-1344: Buffer overflow in htdigest

2005-04-27 Thread Martin Schulze
Are you aware of this: http://www.lucaercoli.it/advs/htdigest.txt http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5EP061FEKC.html http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1344 Regards, Joey -- Everybody talks about it, but nobody does anything about it! -- Mark Twain Please always

Re: Discussing Lingerd's security history

2005-02-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > I'm the maintainer of an unofficial Debian package named > apache-lingerd[1]. > > Lingerd is a patch for apache that enables a better handling of dynamic > pages serving. > > The package works fine and a couple of users reported me that they > use it on production servers

Re: Patch for fixing CAN-2004-0940 in apache 1.3, update

2004-11-04 Thread Martin Schulze
Martin Pitt wrote: > Martin Schulze [2004-11-01 20:18 +0100]: > > Thanks a lot. There's another update in the work that fixes problem > > with htpasswd. I'm attaching the patch. I haven't received a CVE Id > > so will forward it when it is there. >

Re: Patch for fixing CAN-2004-0940 in apache 1.3, update

2004-11-03 Thread Martin Schulze
Martin Pitt wrote: > Hi Joey! > > Martin Schulze [2004-11-01 20:18 +0100]: > > Thanks a lot. There's another update in the work that fixes problem > > with htpasswd. I'm attaching the patch. I haven't received a CVE Id > > so will forward it when i

Re: Patch for fixing CAN-2004-0940 in apache 1.3, update

2004-11-01 Thread Martin Schulze
Martin Pitt wrote: > Martin Pitt [2004-10-29 14:22 +0200]: > > I prepared a patch for fixing a mod_include buffer overflow in Ubuntu > > and was asked by Fabio to upload a fixed sid version as well > > (1.3.31-7). > > > > Please find attached the interdiff that was used for 1.3.31-7; you can > > r

Bug#273412: CAN-2004-0811: Apache 2.0.51 authentication bypass

2004-09-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Package: apache2 Version: 2.0.51-2 Severity: critical Tags: security A problem has been reported to exist in Apache after upgrading to 2.0.51 which results in being able to access web pages one shouldn't be able to access, i.e. bypassing the authentication method. Here's a fix > http://www.apach

Re: CAN-2004-0811: Apache 2.0.51 authentication bypass

2004-09-23 Thread Martin Schulze
Please take care of this issue. This seems to affect the version in sid as well. Please mention the CAN from in the changelog when you prepare an update. Mark J Cox wrote: > A number of users have reported that after upgrading to 2.0.51 their > password protected pages have been served without r