On 24.07.2013 22:47, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> The bug in apache2 is that we still treat this situation as an
>> upgrade in the postinst even if there is nothing left of the old
>> install. If we can detect it, we should probably treat it as a new
>> install instead.
I do not think we could in a d
Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2013, 22:07:02 schrieb Stefan Fritsch:
> This is the problem. You have used --purge-unused (with aptitude)
> or --purge (with apt-get) while upgrading. Or the respective
> config options have been set in the apt/aptitude configuration
> files. This won't work and we will docu
Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2013, 21:37:18 schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
> dpkg: apache2.2-common: dependency problems, but removing anyway as
> you requested:
>
> apache2-mpm-worker depends on apache2.2-common (= 2.2.22-13).
>
> apache2 depends on apache2.2-common (= 2.2.22-13).
>
...
>
> Removing ap
On 2013-07-24 21:13:53 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Do you maybe still have the apt-get/aptitude output from the upgrade?
> There should be a copy in /var/log/apt/term.log* if the relevant file
> has not been rotated away, yet.
Log started: 2013-07-14 01:37:08
(Reading database ...
(Reading
Am Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2013, 11:30:49 schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
> On 2013-07-24 10:12:56 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> > > THere have been several reports, mine, another in the bug
> > > report,
> > > that confirm that mods get disabled by upgrading.
> >
> >
> >
> > I did not say your issue does not exi
On 24.07.2013 16:13, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> So your problem should be gone now.
>
> So you could get a few new bug reports tomorrow :-)
"Yay"
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lis
Hi,
On 24.07.2013 12:11, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> the package apache2.2-common (2.2.22-13) is still in sid ... but I
> couldn't find a good explanation why. The source package apache2
> previously providing it has been successfully rebuilt on all
> architectures ...
I bribed paultag to have a lo
On 24.07.2013 13:54, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Removal does not work easily, since gnome depends on apache2.
Gnome depends on apache2-bin which works fine without apache2 and any
configuration file as they are all in apache2.
> So how should I know what modules etc should be active and what not?
On Mi, 24 Jul 2013, Arno Töll wrote:
> I did not say your issue does not exist. But it does not happen under
> normal circumstances. In fact I am not even able to reproduce it, and
Then at least provide a way to resolve the issue!
There is *no* way to know or recreate the proper or default initia
Hi,
the package apache2.2-common (2.2.22-13) is still in sid ... but I
couldn't find a good explanation why. The source package apache2
previously providing it has been successfully rebuilt on all
architectures ...
This is a bit nasty as it blocks most piuparts tests for upgrading
apache packages
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 717610 apache2/2.4.6-1
Bug #717610 {Done: Arno Töll } [apache2]
apache2-maintscript-helper doesn't support dpkg triggers
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #717610 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing
On 2013-07-24 10:12:56 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> > THere have been several reports, mine, another in the bug report,
> > that confirm that mods get disabled by upgrading.
>
> I did not say your issue does not exist. But it does not happen under
> normal circumstances.
The bug occurred for me in a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 717610 apache2/2.4.6-1
Bug #717610 {Done: Arno Töll } [apache2]
apache2-maintscript-helper doesn't support dpkg triggers
Marked as found in versions apache2/2.4.6-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 711925 important
Bug #711925 [apache2-doc] apache2-doc's config file breaks apache itself
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
711925: http://bugs.deb
severity 711925 important
thanks
Playing severity ping pong does not exactly convince me to prioritize
your issue.
> THere have been several reports, mine, another in the bug report,
> that confirm that mods get disabled by upgrading.
I did not say your issue does not exist. But it does not happ
15 matches
Mail list logo
