Bug#485922: marked as done (apr: -fstack-protector results in FTBFS on etch)

2010-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:51:50 +0200 with message-id <201004202351.50715...@sfritsch.de> and subject line Re: Bug#485922: apr: -fstack-protector results in FTBFS on etch has caused the Debian Bug report #485922, regarding apr: -fstack-protector results in FTBFS on etch to be marked as

Bug#577239: marked as done (apxs2 is broken with Perl 5.12)

2010-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#577239: fixed in apache2 2.2.15-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #577239, regarding apxs2 is broken with Perl 5.12 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#576572: marked as done (apache2.2-common: please move CustomLog directive to a conf.d fragment)

2010-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#576572: fixed in apache2 2.2.15-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #576572, regarding apache2.2-common: please move CustomLog directive to a conf.d fragment to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#576105: marked as done (apache2.2-common: logrotate configuration seems outdated)

2010-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#576105: fixed in apache2 2.2.15-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #576105, regarding apache2.2-common: logrotate configuration seems outdated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#576089: marked as done (empty /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin)

2010-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:48:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#576089: fixed in apache2 2.2.15-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #576089, regarding empty /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

apache2_2.2.15-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-20 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: apache2-dbg_2.2.15-4_i386.deb to main/a/apache2/apache2-dbg_2.2.15-4_i386.deb apache2-doc_2.2.15-4_all.deb to main/a/apache2/apache2-doc_2.2.15-4_all.deb apache2-mpm-event_2.2.15-4_i386.deb to main/a/apache2/apache2-mpm-event_2.2.15-4_i386.deb apache2-mpm-itk_2.2.15-4_i386.deb

Bug#578566: Apache process hangs when trying to authenticate against Fedora Directory Server LDAP using mod_authnz_ldap

2010-04-20 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Kevin Göser wrote: > We are using Apache and basic auth against a Fedora Directory > Server (v1.1.3, running on a different machine). The setup worked > fine on etch. After upgrading to lenny today, the LDAP > authentication seems to be broken: Directly after reloading

Processing of apache2_2.2.15-4_i386.changes

2010-04-20 Thread Archive Administrator
apache2_2.2.15-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apache2_2.2.15-4.dsc apache2_2.2.15-4.diff.gz apache2-doc_2.2.15-4_all.deb apache2.2-common_2.2.15-4_i386.deb apache2.2-bin_2.2.15-4_i386.deb apache2-mpm-worker_2.2.15-4_i386.deb apache2-mpm-prefork

Bug#578566: Apache process hangs when trying to authenticate against Fedora Directory Server LDAP using mod_authnz_ldap

2010-04-20 Thread Kevin Göser
Package: apache2.2-common Version: 2.2.9-10+lenny7 Severity: important We are using Apache and basic auth against a Fedora Directory Server (v1.1.3, running on a different machine). The setup worked fine on etch. After upgrading to lenny today, the LDAP authentication seems to be broken: Directl

Bug#568542: marked as done (apache2.2-common: missing psmisc dependency)

2010-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:55:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#568542: fixed in apache2 2.2.9-10+lenny8 has caused the Debian Bug report #568542, regarding apache2.2-common: missing psmisc dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-20 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: apache2-dbg_2.2.9-10+lenny8_i386.deb to main/a/apache2/apache2-dbg_2.2.9-10+lenny8_i386.deb apache2-doc_2.2.9-10+lenny8_all.deb to main/a/apache2/apache2-doc_2.2.9-10+lenny8_all.deb apache2-mpm-event_2.2.9-10+lenny8_i386.deb to main/a/a

apache2_2.2.9-10+lenny7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2010-04-20 Thread Archive Administrator
Notes: Mapping stable-security to proposed-updates. Accepted: apache2-dbg_2.2.9-10+lenny7_i386.deb to main/a/apache2/apache2-dbg_2.2.9-10+lenny7_i386.deb apache2-doc_2.2.9-10+lenny7_all.deb to main/a/apache2/apache2-doc_2.2.9-10+lenny7_all.deb apache2-mpm-event_2.2.9-10+lenny7_i386.deb to