[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - * Fix some lintian warnings.
> + * Fix some lintian warnings, add some overrides, and make the
> +package binNMU safe.
Well, the package was already binNMU safe. ${Source-Version} and
${binary:Version} actually mean the same thing. The old variable just
has a mislead
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:38:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389607: Can't reproduce this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:28:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line apache2ctl startssl not documented in man page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:28:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line apache2ctl startssl not documented in man page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 391817 pending
Bug#391817: apache2-mpm-prefork: /usr/sbin/apache2 -h doesn't list the -X option
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:22:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line apache2 not starting
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Hello!
I can't reproduce this problem anymore. Seems like the bug has gone in
one of the latest versions.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am not sure that it would be a good idea to automatically add
rewrite rules via packages, because it would be quite easy to break
RewriteRules added by the user. For example, automatically added
rules could not use the [L] flag.
What kind of rules would you want to add. Maybe you could u
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:29:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line init script stop action warns about running apache2 processes
when there are none
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
This happens if NO_START=1 is set in /etc/default/apache2 (because
something else was listening on port 80 during installation).
Therefore a workaround is to set NO_START=0
The init script displays a warning if VERBOSE=yes in /etc/default/rcS,
but this doesn't seem to be the default anymore. At
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 418499 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#418499: Bug in installation of apache2
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo, unreproducible
> retitle 418499 apache2ctl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> reassign 408462 apache2.2-common
Bug#408462: /etc/default/apache2 NO_START option
Bug reassigned from package `apache2' to `apache2.2-common'.
> forcemerge 374667 408462
Bug#374667:
diff -u /etc/init.d/apache2 /tmp/apache2
--- /etc/init.d/apache2 2007-06-18 00:12:56.0 +0400
+++ /tmp/apache22007-06-24 06:46:46.135775844 +0400
@@ -102,10 +102,10 @@
if [ -n "${PID:-}" ]; then
i=0
while $(kill -0 "${PID:-}" 2> /dev/null); do
Thanks for the report.
Unfortunately it is a bit too late to fix this in Debian etch r1, but
it will be fixed in r2.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
14 matches
Mail list logo
