Processed: Re: Bug#398817: apache2/2.2.3-3.1 Segmentation faults (11)

2006-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 398817 important Bug#398817: apache2/2.2.3-3.1 Segmentation faults (11) Severity set to `important' from `grave' > tags 398817 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#398817: apache2/2.2.3-3.1 Segmentation faults (11) There were no tags set. Tags added: m

Bug#398817: apache2/2.2.3-3.1 Segmentation faults (11)

2006-11-15 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 398817 important tags 398817 moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 08:42:03PM +0100, Thomas Babut wrote: > on a Debian Testing system with some packages from Unstable (php5) I'm > getting in apache2/2.2.3-3.1 many Segmentation faults (11) after the > apache server is runn

Processed: your mail

2006-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 391290 please ship sample rewrite.conf w/ examples Bug#391290: apache should ship with a default rewrite.conf with an Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#391290: apache should automatically detect extra periods/commas at the end of URLs and fix

2006-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 391290 apache should ship with a default rewrite.conf with an Bug#391290: apache should automatically detect extra periods/commas at the end of URLs and fix Changed Bug title. > example in it Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Bug#398817: apache2/2.2.3-3.1 Segmentation faults (11)

2006-11-15 Thread Thomas Babut
Package: apache2.2-common Version: 2.2.3-3.1 Severity: grave Hi, on a Debian Testing system with some packages from Unstable (php5) I'm getting in apache2/2.2.3-3.1 many Segmentation faults (11) after the apache server is running for some hours. It's a frequently high visited webserver. The apac

Bug#397526: apache2.2-common: Extras for deflate.conf: application/x-javascript text/css

2006-11-15 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Monday 13 November 2006 06:30, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > >> Could you add application/x-javascript and text/css to > >> deflate.conf? > > > > This does not work reliably with MSIE 6. > > > > For text/css this is definitely the case with the most current > > MSIE 6, > > > :( > > Do you have any

Bug#398520: missing /usr/sbin/apache2-ssl-certificate

2006-11-15 Thread Greg Folkert
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 15:14 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Dennis Hoppe] > > i am using debian etch and can not find the script for generating an > > self signed ssl certificate. it is no problem to create an self > > signed ssl certificate or better use ca cert, but it is easier to use > > a scr

Bug#398520: what about apache2-ssl-certificate?

2006-11-15 Thread Bastian Venthur
Please CC me. What happened to the good old "apache2-ssl-certificate"-script which was (as far as i remember) in apache2-common prior apache2.2? Please re-include it or at least provide it in /usr/share/doc/apache2/examples, similar to exim4. Cheers, Bastian -- Bastian Venthur

Processed: found 396631 in 1.2.7-7, notfound 396631 in 2.2.3-3

2006-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25 > found 396631 1.2.7-7 Bug#396631: Files served have 0 bytes in spite of claims in headers & log Bug marked as found in version 1.2.7-7. > notfound 396631 2.2.3-3 Bug#396631: Files ser

Processed: reassign 396631 to libapr1, severity of 396631 is serious, tagging 396631

2006-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25 > reassign 396631 libapr1 Bug#396631: Files served have 0 bytes in spite of claims in headers & log Bug reassigned from package `apache2' to `libapr1'. > severity 396631 serious Bug#39

Bug#396631: more information

2006-11-15 Thread Adam Conrad
Peter Samuelson wrote: > >> Peter noted that this suggests a deeper problem with libapr, because >> my kernel doesn't support sendfile64() but libapr1's configure script >> decided I had it anyway. > > Hoping (but not promising) to get a tested patch into apr in the next > few hours, Peter Check t

Bug#396631: more information

2006-11-15 Thread Peter Samuelson
> Peter noted that this suggests a deeper problem with libapr, because > my kernel doesn't support sendfile64() but libapr1's configure script > decided I had it anyway. This turns out to have been the problem. Once Branden kludged apr not to detect sendfile64, his problems seem to have gone awa