mod_authnz_ldap weirdness

2006-11-13 Thread Rob Leach
Anyone else been playing with mod_authnz_ldap in an apache virtual server setup? I originally setup a virtual server with mod_auth_ldap configured, at some point after an apt-get update/upgrade mod_auth_ldap got disabled from apache mod startup and mod_authnz_ldap used instead. After working throug

Processed: lynx-package

2006-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 120451 fixed-upstream Bug#120451: lynx: default colors Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > tag 240237 fixed-upstream Bug#240237: misparses URL scheme Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-upstream > tag 277848 moreinfo Bug#277848: lynx's

Bug#307346: marked as done (Some images packaged with apache-common not in apache2-common)

2006-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:39:41 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Some images packaged with apache-common not in apache2-common has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#307346: Some images packaged with apache-common not in apache2-common

2006-11-13 Thread Robert Stone
That's a perfectly valid response. If a stock apache doesn't refer to the content, then there isn't a strong reason to make sure they are available. Thanks for the update. -Robert On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:42:11PM +0100, Thijs Kinkh

[bts-link] source package apache2

2006-11-13 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package apache2 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #175351 # * http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17629 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW us

Bug#397886: apache2.2-common: non wanted behaviour during upgrade: charset MUST not be created without user consent

2006-11-13 Thread BRIAND, Michel M (ASTEK SUD OUEST)
>On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:52:32PM +0100, Steinar H. >Gunderson wrote: > >> Anyhow, looking at the changelog, this option is >supposed only to be enabled >> for new installations, and the logic in the postinst >seems correct. Are you >> really upgrading, or is t

Bug#385588: apache2-mpm-worker *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption

2006-11-13 Thread Ruben Puettmann
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:23:07PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > Do you have any update on this? Also, does it still occur with the > latest 2.2.3 version as available in testing/unstable? > Sorry no new Infoprmation. We have switched the apache2 to prefork and all runs fine. It is an produc

Bug#255588: Semantically incorrect file extensions for charsets

2006-11-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:33:02PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > I think this bug is fixed in unstable, because now the default apache2.conf > > says: > > I agree that it is fixed, is there any reason to keep this bug open? Like I said in that mail - it should go into the suggested_correction