severity 396782 important
thanks
* Don Geddis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061102 13:05]:
> I had a working apache2 configuration, with many virtual hosts.
> After this recent upgrade, parts of my web sites stopped working.
> I eventually discovered that the upgrade had added a new
> 000-default
> v
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 396782 important
Bug#396782: apache2.2-common: Upgrade adds "default" virtual host; breaks
existing config
Severity set to `important' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 08:45:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This isn't sparc64 specific
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392349: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396678: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393913: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392701: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392352: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395976: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391393: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:03:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397310: fixed in apache2 2.2.3-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
apache2-mpm-event_2.2.3-3.1_i386.deb: package says section is web, override
says net.
apache2-mpm-perchild_2.2.3-3.1_all.deb: package says section is web, override
says net.
apache2-mpm-p
Accepted:
apache2-doc_2.2.3-3.1_all.deb
to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-doc_2.2.3-3.1_all.deb
apache2-mpm-event_2.2.3-3.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-mpm-event_2.2.3-3.1_i386.deb
apache2-mpm-perchild_2.2.3-3.1_all.deb
to pool/main/a/apache2/apache2-mpm-perchild_2.2.3-3.1_all.deb
a
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:52:32PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Anyhow, looking at the changelog, this option is supposed only to be enabled
> for new installations, and the logic in the postinst seems correct. Are you
> really upgrading, or is this a new installation?
It's a "new" instal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 396265 grave
Bug#396265: apache2: mod_proxy_ajp connection reuse bug
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> tags 396265 + patch
Bug#396265: apache2: mod_proxy_ajp connection reuse bug
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> --
Stopping p
Hi,
* Greg Wooledge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061106 11:12]:
> Sorry about the "root@" thing. I don't normally login to that server
> as myself. This is my normal (work) e-mail address should you need to
> contact me.
Thank you for your bug report.
According to http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/upg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 397239 + upstream
Bug#397239: apache2: Since ugrading to 2.2.3-3, webdav doesn't work: Invalid
command 'AuthDigestFile'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
tags 397239 + upstream
thanks
* Peter Egli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061105 14:20]:
> Starting web server (apache2)...Syntax error on line 24 of
> /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/webdav:
> Invalid command 'AuthDigestFile', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module
> not included in the server configuratio
apache2_2.2.3-3.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apache2_2.2.3-3.1.dsc
apache2_2.2.3-3.1.diff.gz
apache2.2-common_2.2.3-3.1_i386.deb
apache2-mpm-worker_2.2.3-3.1_i386.deb
apache2-mpm-prefork_2.2.3-3.1_i386.deb
apache2-mpm-event_2.2.3-3.1_i386.deb
* Tollef Fog Heen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061029 06:54]:
> * "Thomas Schoepf"
>
> | > Given that a2dissite is not called as part of any of the maintainer
> | > scripts for apache2.2-common, I somehow don't think the problem lies
> | > with Apache here.
> |
> | apache2-common does remove all symlink
I assume my point of view. I think I'm not alone.
I'm upgrading, but maybe there is a problem in the correct sense upgrade
was meant by dpkg at this very moment:
2006-11-09 16:47:08 install apache2.2-common 2.2.3-3
because :
2006-11-09 16:47:01 status installed apache2-common 2.0.55-4.1
2006-
I globally agree with you but why one would want to break a working
environment ?
We don't have necessary the time to adapt all web site on the planet to
the new implementations.
I don't say that this implementation is not good, that's probably the
best way to manage new contents as utf8 is spead
* Dan North ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061110 17:27]:
> I'm afraid I have to disagree with your statement that "2.4 kernels are
> slowly phasing out". It seems that a lot of VPS suppliers are using 2.4
> kernels in their virtual machines. Underneath it's running a 2.6 kernel,
> but products like Virtu
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:47:45PM +0100, Michel Briand wrote:
> I globally agree with you but why one would want to break a working
> environment ?
What's to say it's working? It breaks in one specific use case for you; don't
assume it's worse for everybody else too.
> We don't have necessary th
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 10:36:10AM +0100, Michel Briand wrote:
> mozilla selects utf8 if apache told him that its the default - even if the
> page designer used the content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15" in headers
Well.
AddDefaultCharset simply sets the default character set when the page does
Hi Andreas.
I'm afraid I have to disagree with your statement that "2.4 kernels are
slowly phasing out". It seems that a lot of VPS suppliers are using 2.4
kernels in their virtual machines. Underneath it's running a 2.6
kernel, but products like Virtuozzo seem to like 2.4 kernels.
Cheers,
Da
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061110 14:30]:
> There is another often-reported issue:
> * #298689: apache2: logrotate script and new init script break ssl
>certificates with passphrase
> * #314878: apache2-common: Do 'reload' instead of 'restart' in
>logrotate.d/apa
I see this too with 2.2.3-3 on unstable. AMD64.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I worked a bit today on apache2 bugs.
I intend to fix the following bugs ASAP:
* #397310: apache2: silently breaks website authentication
needs to add an a2enmod authz_user at the appropriate place.
* #392349: apache 2.2 upgrade breaks, missing Order (authz_host
module)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 395853 serious
Bug#395853: apache2-common: removes symlinks on upgrade
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 397481 apache2-mpm-prefork: segfault on startup on 2.4 kernels
Bug#397481: apache2-mpm-prefork: segfault on startup
Changed Bug title.
> forcemerge 394714 397481
Bug#394714: apache2-mpm-prefork: Apache2 child processes segfaults
Bug#397481: apa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 397886 serious
Bug#397886: apache2.2-common: non wanted behaviour during upgrade: charset
MUST not be created without user consent
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
severity 397886 serious
thanks
Hi,
* Michel Briand ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061110 01:34]:
> This will modify apache configuration during an upgrade. Eventually will
> cause all sites served locally to be IMPACTED by wrong charsets [mozilla
> selects utf8 if apache told him that its the default - eve
retitle 395714 apache2 doesn't run on 2.4 kernels
block 395714 by 392049
thanks
* Peter Samuelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061023 15:17]:
> Yeah, see #392049 and its duplicates. Tollef has a patch for libapr,
> which I guess will go in soon.
Marking this bug appropriate.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # default modules went missing since apache2 - fix typo in postinst
> forcemerge 392349 392352 392701 393913 396678
Bug#392349: apache 2.2 upgrade breaks, missing Order (authz_host module)
Bug#392352: apache2.2-common: install does not enable replacemen
retitle 397481 apache2-mpm-prefork: segfault on startup on 2.4 kernels
forcemerge 394714 397481
thanks
* Mark Sheppard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061109 10:07]:
> I installed linux-image-2.6.17-2-686 (version 2.6.17-9) on the server in
> question and rebooted with that and apache2 now works. That serve
* Sven Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060625 09:23]:
> Package: apache2-mpm-prefork
> Version: 2.0.54-5
> Severity: important
>
> After a system crash, apache2 left an empty file behind
> (/var/run/apache2/__db.ssl_scache to be exact). On reboot,
> the file wasn't removed and when apache2 started, i
libapr1 (1.2.7-6) made it to testing. It took me a while to figure out why
I got segfaults on the Apache upgrade; Yes, my server runs a 2.4 kernel.
The deb-src solution worked for me too.
Is the 1.2.7-7 release coming to testing really soon?
regards,
Jeroen
--
http://www.redslider.net
--
To
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-3
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
In apache2.2-common somebody choose to set up default charset:
apache2.2-common.postinst:45:
if [ ! -f /etc/apache2/conf.d/charset ]; then
echo "AddDefaultCharset UTF-8" > /etc/apac
39 matches
Mail list logo
