From: Wilton<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] >;
--
Flozar Heart Health News:
Breakthrough Natural Cholesterol Reduction System:
60% of people are at risk. are YOU?
No Dangerous side effects suc
Did those bus drivers regret singing?
Those janitors aren't missing sleeping right now.
Tell me when you have loved singing.
Don't you practice cooking nicely?
About life
The musicians have missed playing since a few days ago.
Biggest stores of on'line pharmacies.
Over than 150 major meds
Highest qualities assured on our online generic meds
at the most competitive prices.
Vi'sit us today's!
http://www.ilovemeds.com/index.php?aid=8
This is 1 -time mailing. N0-re m0val are re'qui-red
rngX3UsTM5q6BEJpSf7vMbrEgRFo
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:07:16PM +, Thom May wrote:
> They should send useful patches to the dev list (both apr and httpd), make
> their build system and
> everything that they do absolutely compatible with the upstream way of doing
> it (last I looked, metux required automake to build, whic
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:07:16PM +, Thom May wrote:
> They should send useful patches to the dev list (both apr and httpd), make
> their build system and
> everything that they do absolutely compatible with the upstream way of doing
> it (last I looked, metux required automake to build, whic
* Nick Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:56:43PM +, Thom May wrote:
> > I'm strongly opposed to doing this. I see no sign that the metux authors
> > have any desire to integrate metux with upstream, and I absolutely think
> > that the apache2 package should not co
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:56:43PM +, Thom May wrote:
> I'm strongly opposed to doing this. I see no sign that the metux authors
> have any desire to integrate metux with upstream, and I absolutely think
> that the apache2 package should not contain any major components that aren't
> included i
7 matches
Mail list logo
