Samuel Thibault, le Thu 30 Oct 2014 21:00:26 +0100, a écrit :
> Halim Sahin schrieb am 03.12.2013, 18:17 +0100:
> > It should now the time to figure out:
> >
> > * how early boot messages should be read
Sorry, I misquoted: Sebastian Humenda wrote it.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Hello,
Halim Sahin schrieb am 03.12.2013, 18:17 +0100:
>Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt
>in userspace.
>In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set.
>If someone tries to remove vt support from kernel completely we.ll loose
>a great, stable environme
Hi,
On Di, Dez 03, 2013 at 06:59:13 +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
> Halim Sahin schrieb am 03.12.2013, 18:17 +0100:
> >Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt
> >in userspace.
> >In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set.
> >If someone tries to remove vt
Hello Halim,
Halim Sahin schrieb am 03.12.2013, 18:17 +0100:
>Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt
>in userspace.
>In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set.
>If someone tries to remove vt support from kernel completely we.ll loose
>a great, stable env
Hi all,
Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt
in userspace.
In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set.
If someone tries to remove vt support from kernel completely we.ll loose
a great, stable environment.
Afaik sbl and brltty depend on /dev/vcs* /dev/tty
5 matches
Mail list logo