Hi,
On 16-12-17 02:20, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Paul Gevers, on ven. 15 déc. 2017 10:01:26 +0100, wrote:
>> There is a new version not yet packaged for Debian. I think the upload
>> would be trivial. Are you getting around to it, or shall I just upload
>> it?
>
> Thanks for the upload :)
You're
Hello,
Paul Gevers, on ven. 15 déc. 2017 10:01:26 +0100, wrote:
> There is a new version not yet packaged for Debian. I think the upload
> would be trivial. Are you getting around to it, or shall I just upload
> it?
Thanks for the upload :)
Samuel
Hi Samuel,
On 15-12-17 11:11, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> the point is that in non-free, packages can be white listed to be
>> auto-build, while packages in contrib need manual building and
>> uploading.
>
> Perhaps that's also a point that should be fixed? I don't see why non-free
> could be auto
Hello,
Paul Gevers, on ven. 15 déc. 2017 10:32:39 +0100, wrote:
> Additional question. Does anybody mind moving speech-dispatcher-contrib
> to non-free? Albeit being philosophically wrong,
It's actually arguably non-wrong, in the sense that
speech-dispatcher-contrib doesn't actually provide anyth
Hi,
On 15-12-17 10:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
> If I followed announcement correctly, you are now involved with
> speech-dispatcher upstream. There is a new version not yet packaged for
> Debian. I think the upload would be trivial. Are you getting around to
> it, or shall I just upload it?
Additiona
Hi Samuel,
If I followed announcement correctly, you are now involved with
speech-dispatcher upstream. There is a new version not yet packaged for
Debian. I think the upload would be trivial. Are you getting around to
it, or shall I just upload it?
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
6 matches
Mail list logo
