Hello everyone,
I am absoolutely new linux user and I started with debian.
So, I have a question.
How do I change the variant that is used for eSpeak-ng and it's
parameters such as inflection?
As far as i understand the default variant is None.
How do I change it?
I Could find it in
Hello,
Tobias Platen, le ven. 08 mai 2020 18:59:29 +0200, a ecrit:
> I've written a small patch for eSpeak NG which adds a singing synthesis mode
> similar to the singing-mode.scm included in Festival and used by the Singing
> Computer[1].
> The patch adds two options for setti
I've written a small patch for eSpeak NG which adds a singing synthesis mode
similar to the singing-mode.scm included in Festival and used by the Singing
Computer[1].
The patch adds two options for setting the note pitch in Hertz or as a midi
note number.
When singing mode is selected, e
I will set up a VM in Qemu for testing this sometime this week. I don't want to
experiment with Espeak-ng and Speech Dispatcher on my main system in case
speech is lost for some reason since I am totally blind. With any luck, I will
be able to bisect this. Thanks.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, at
Hello am_dxer,
I suspect a bug on the speech-dispatcher side or on espeak-ng side.
Could it be possible for you to investigate this issue?
Best regards,
Alex.
Le 16/04/2018 à 05:56, am_d...@fastmail.fm a écrit :
When using Espeak-ng, Orca doesn't read < or > for me when punctua
When using Espeak-ng, Orca doesn't read < or > for me when punctuation is set
to all. I didn't have this problem when using standard Espeak. This can be
reproduced when reading by line or word. I tested in Firefox and Pluma. The
punctuation setting is on the speech tab of Or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 872194 espeak-ng
Bug #872194 [espeakup] espeakup: Espeakup fails to start due to
libespeak-ng.so.1.1.49 segfault
Bug reassigned from package 'espeakup' to 'espeak-ng'.
No longer marked as found in versions espe
Hello,
Ali Gürler, on ven. 23 juin 2017 11:28:59 +0200, wrote:
> What kind of package is that?
Brltty does not use the espeak or espeak-ng package, it directly uses
libespeak-ng. So you don't actually have the choice.
Samuel
What kind of package is that?
Regards,
Ali
--
I was able to reproduce this as well when using RC4 of the Debian
Installer for Stretch when using the s option from the boot menu. I
found that I was not always able to interrupt speech with a keyboard
command. When the speech finally stopped, it seemed to repeat different
parts of the phrase. Its
Hello Samuel,
Samuel Thibault schrieb am 24.05.2017, 17:16 +0200:
>Eric Scheibler, on mer. 24 mai 2017 10:53:30 +0200, wrote:
>> But yesterday I've updated my system and installed espeak version
>> 1.49.0+dfsg-10 and now it's as bad as described in bug #848016 again.
>
>Just to make sure, could y
Hello,
Eric Scheibler, on mer. 24 mai 2017 10:53:30 +0200, wrote:
> But yesterday I've updated my system and installed espeak version
> 1.49.0+dfsg-10 and now it's as bad as described in bug #848016 again.
Just to make sure, could you try to downgrade to 1.49.0+dfsg-9 to check
whether the changes
--communication-method unix_socket
Then I killed all speech dispatcher instances:
pkill speech-dispatch
and the overlapping is gone again and brltty works with espeak-ng like a charm.
Then I tested the following from tty1:
spd-say hello
Speech dispatcher speaks "hello" and the overlappi
Hello,
this issue refers to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848016
With espeak-ng version 1.49.0+dfsg-7 the problem was not fixed entirely but the
speech overlapping
was on a tolerable level. But yesterday I've updated my system and installed
espeak version
1.49.0+dfsg-1
Hello,
Amir-Trend Plus, on dim. 02 avril 2017 15:54:01 +0800, wrote:
> last time when i was using arch linux, the espeak-ng that was there
> contains arabic language, but on espeak-ng from debian unstable does
> not contain it. can i get the updated package from other site? or
> maybe
Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2017 15:05:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#860891: fixed in espeak-ng 1.49.0+dfsg-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #860891,
regarding espeak-ng doesn't work with mbrola-us3 voice
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Package: espeak-ng
Version: 1.49.0+dfsg-9
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I just tried to help with Launchpad bug 1684280¹ and I tried the following
commands:
paul@testavoira ~ $ /usr/bin/espeak -v mb-us3 "Hello world"
paul@testavoira ~ $ /usr/bin/es
mware/
the question is, can i use the package espeak-ng and
speech-dispatcher uploaded to debian and install them to vinux 5.1
witch is based on ubuntu 14.04.5? the speech-dispatcher on debian is
0.86 and vinux is 0.85, and the espeak-ng on vinux cannot work with
this speech-dispatcher.
You s
from graphical user interface, unless
there is a way to install using the command line, for computers that
use wifi only. the question is, can i use the package espeak-ng and
speech-dispatcher uploaded to debian and install them to vinux 5.1
witch is based on ubuntu 14.04.5? the speech-dispatcher on
Hi,
i am using ubuntu now but i downloaded packages from debian unstable.
I've updated speech-dispatcher to 0.86, and orca to 3.22.2, and
installed espeak-ng. but, is this the latest espeak-ng? last time when
i was using arch linux, the espeak-ng that was there contains arabic
language, b
Hello,
Samuel Thibault schrieb am 24.01.2017, 3:36 +0100:
>So, can people please test libespeak-ng1 version 1.49.0+dfsg-7 which
>should be available within a few hours? You can use the unstable
>versions of espeakup (1:0.80-5) and brltty (5.4-6), do not use the
>spurious.
As others have alread
Kirk Reiser, on Tue 24 Jan 2017 13:06:16 -0500, wrote:
> I have to say the fixes you put in over the past day or so have
> improved espeak-ng responsiveness emensely.
Cool :)
Samuel
Hello Samuel and all: I have to say the fixes you put in over the past
day or so have improved espeak-ng responsiveness emensely. I've only
done preliminary tests so far but it seems to behaving itself very
well indeed. Almost instant flushing and clean sounding moving between
lines wit
Tom Fowle, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 20:31:27 -0800, wrote:
> Am I correct to assume these versions do not effect use of speakup with
> hardware synthesizers?
Yes.
> and would not apply to such setups using wheezie?
It doesn't either.
Samuel
Am I correct to assume these versions do not effect use of speakup with
hardware synthesizers?
and would not apply to such setups using wheezie?
Thanks
Tom Fowle
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:31:24 +0100, wrote:
> > Samuel
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2017 02:50:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#851484: fixed in espeak-ng 1.49.0+dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #851484,
regarding espeak-ng: Update Homepage and Vcs-* fields
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
table
versions of espeakup (1:0.80-5) and brltty (5.4-6), do not use the
experimental versions which introduce a delay which is actually
spurious.
I hope this time it'll be good enough for Stretch :)
The technical details are in
https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/issues/172#issuecomment
e is something preventing from doing the tests, please tell, I
> can't guess it.
>
> Since the migration to espeak-ng poses strong problems, we *have* to
> fix them before the release. If people don't actually test the fixes,
> there's no way we can be sure that things ar
Hi
Samuel Thibault schrieb am 23.01.2017, 15:43 +0100:
>Sebastian Humenda, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 14:41:23 +0100, wrote:
>> At the moment, I feel as if a really small cancel pause would be the option I
>> could live best with.
>
>Just to check, did you try just plain 0 cancel pause ?
I cannot hear a d
Thanks for your tests,
Sebastian Humenda, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 14:41:23 +0100, wrote:
> At the moment, I feel as if a really small cancel pause would be the option I
> could live best with.
Just to check, did you try just plain 0 cancel pause ?
Samuel
Hi Øyvind
Øyvind Lode schrieb am 23.01.2017, 14:12 +0100:
>I've upgraded both brltty and espeakup (remotely via ssh since I'm at work
>now).
>I'll help you out test later today.
Please also upgrade brltty-espeak.
>What exactly should I test?
- Do you realize some kind of overlap when typing qu
Hi:
I've upgraded both brltty and espeakup (remotely via ssh since I'm at work now).
I'll help you out test later today.
What exactly should I test?
I vaguely remember seeing a thread about some issues but I must say
that I never noticed it myself.
On 23 January 2017 at 13:31, Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:31:24 +0100, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:21:03 +0100, wrote:
> > deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main
>
> to be more precise: after having added this line to
> /etc/apt/sources.list, run
>
> apt-get update
Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:21:03 +0100, wrote:
> deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main
to be more precise: after having added this line to
/etc/apt/sources.list, run
apt-get update
apt-get install brltty=5.4-5
apt-get install espeakup=1:0.80-4
Samuel
it.
Since the migration to espeak-ng poses strong problems, we *have* to
fix them before the release. If people don't actually test the fixes,
there's no way we can be sure that things are alright. I did test these
packages, but since I'm no speech user, I can't have a good idea
While its a different type of package, I notice this overlap in 1 of the newer
Voxin 1.6 in Vinux. Also while arrowing, speech rate seems to drop by 1 step
until you re-read the current line.
Hart
Samuel Thibault, on Sun 15 Jan 2017 15:57:48 +0100, wrote:
> I'll try to introduce that in brltty too.
I have uploaded brltty packages on
http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/
too. The delay can be changed with the cancel_pause espeak parameter,
e.g.:
/sbin/brltty -S cancel_pause=150 blabla
the previous line in the current line. It gives a sound like a shoosh
> at the start of each keystroke.
Ok, I think I see what you mean.
I believe it's actually an effect of our ears :)
I have noticed that espeak-ng is way more "reactive" than espeak, in
that when espeakup use
On 15 January 2017 at 09:22, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> Patch attached.
>
> Patch was forgotten :)
I wanted to wait for bugs.debian.org to assign a bug number first to
add that to the patch too but you were too fast!
Jeremy
Hello,
Jeremy Bicha, on Sun 15 Jan 2017 09:10:51 -0500, wrote:
> The Homepage and Vcs fields still point to espeak instead of espeak-ng.
>
> Patch attached.
Patch was forgotten :)
Anyway, I figured it out easily of course, and will fix them.
Thanks,
Samuel
://git.debian.org/git/pkg-a11y/espeak.git
-Homepage: http://espeak.sourceforge.net/
+Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-a11y/espeak-ng.git/
+Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-a11y/espeak-ng.git/
+Homepage: https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng
Build-Depends: debhelper
Package: espeak-ng
Version: 1.49.0+dfsg-6
Tags: patch
The Homepage and Vcs fields still point to espeak instead of espeak-ng.
Patch attached.
Thanks,
Jeremy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 848158 espeak-ng
Bug #848158 [brltty-espeak] brltty-espeak: very monotonous speech
Bug reassigned from package 'brltty-espeak' to 'espeak-ng'.
No longer marked as found in versions brltty/5.4-3.
Ignoring request
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2016 15:19:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#848016: fixed in espeak-ng 1.49.0+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #848016,
regarding espeak-ng: noticable delays in speech output
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 848016 espeak-ng
Bug #848016 [brltty-espeak] espeak-ng: noticable delays in speech output
Bug reassigned from package 'brltty-espeak' to 'espeak-ng'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #848016 to the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 848016 -1
Bug #848016 [brltty-espeak] brltty-espeak: very monotonous speech and noticable
delays in speech output
Bug 848016 cloned as bug 848158
> reassign 848016 espeak-ng
Bug #848016 [brltty-espeak] brltty-espeak: very monotonous
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 848016 https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/issues/171
Bug #848016 [brltty-espeak] brltty-espeak: very monotonous speech and noticable
delays in speech output
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/espeak-ng/e
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 848008 https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/issues/171
Bug #848008 [brltty] brltty: fails to detect keyboard when started before
systemd-udev-settle.service
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/espeak-ng/e
Your message dated Sun, 27 Nov 2016 15:07:13 +0100
with message-id <20161127140713.gj8...@var.home>
and subject line Re: Bug#845758: espeak-ng: please provide espeak
has caused the Debian Bug report #845758,
regarding espeak-ng: please provide espeak
to be marked as done.
This means th
Package: espeak-ng
Version: 1.49.0+dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
while I'm excited to see an active fork of espeak, I felt let down by
the debian packaging: I'd like to switch from using espeak to espeak-ng,
but I'll have to edit my scripts to append the -ng suffix
Hello,
Sebastian Humenda, on Mon 21 Nov 2016 22:35:26 +0100, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault schrieb am 21.11.2016, 21:29 +0100:
> >Samuel Thibault, on Mon 21 Nov 2016 21:28:17 +0100, wrote:
> >> Also, which versions of libespeak-ng1 and libasound2 packages do you have?
> >
> >I'm asking this because I'm
Hello,
Doug Smith, on Wed 16 Nov 2016 16:50:43 -0500, wrote:
> Ok, I just received espeak-ng over here and I wonder how to use it. I have
> both espeak and espeak-ng on here because the install script didn't take it
> off. Now, I have uncommented the add module line in the
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 08:50:43AM AEDT, Doug Smith wrote:
> Ok, I just received espeak-ng over here and I wonder how to use it. I have
> both espeak and espeak-ng on here because the install script didn't take it
> off. Now, I have uncommented the add module line in the
> /etc/
Ok, I just received espeak-ng over here and I wonder how to use it. I
have both espeak and espeak-ng on here because the install script didn't
take it off. Now, I have uncommented the add module line in the
/etc/speech-dispatcher/speechd.conf and I don't see espeak-ng in th
Hi
On 10-11-16 02:33, Devin Prater wrote:
> Good. Now the Emacspeak server just has to be updated to work with NG,
> currently it's very sluggish, and NG will then be pretty established as
> eSpeak's successor.
If you are talking about emacspeak-espeak-server, I just uploaded that
to unstable. Pl
Good. Now the Emacspeak server just has to be updated to work with NG,
currently it's very sluggish, and NG will then be pretty established as
eSpeak's successor.
Devin Pratersent from Gmail.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So espe
Hello,
So espeak-ng has landed in unstable. For now I have uploaded
speech-dispatcher, espeakup and brltty against espeak-ng. That should
be making them behave much better against pulseaudio.
Samuel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 830731 https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/issues/148
Bug #830731 [espeak] espeak: bad pronunciation of "unary"
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/issues/148'.
> thank
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 830730 https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/issues/149
Bug #830730 [src:espeak] espeak: EWMH, UCS, UTF, UUID acronyms
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/issues/149'.
> thanks
Sto
Hello,
For information, I have added repositories for espeak-ng and pcaudiolib:
git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-a11y/espeak-ng.git
git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-a11y/pcaudiolib.git
I have built binaries for pcaudiolib, espeak-ng, and espeakup, they are
available in
deb http://people.debian.org
Reece Dunn, on Sun 11 Sep 2016 12:32:35 +0100, wrote:
> I'll create a 1.49.1 release later this week with these fixes incorporated.
Thanks!
Samuel
> source has been freed at some point, but there is no notice to back
> that.
>
> Looking a bit more, I have found this:
>
> http://www.realitypixels.com/turk/opensource/ToFromIEEE.c.txt
> (linked from http://www.realitypixels.com/turk/opensource/index.html)
>
> That fil
Hello,
Reece Dunn, on Sun 11 Sep 2016 08:42:21 +0100, wrote:
> ieee80.c is present in other applications and libraries with similar headers:
>
> 1. wxWidgets (extended.c) -- [3]https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/blob/
> master/src/common/extended.c#L20
> 2. sox (aiff.c) -- [4]https://search
On 11 September 2016 at 01:24, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Reece Dunn, on Sat 10 Sep 2016 11:35:40 +0100, wrote:
> > I have created a 1.49.0 stable release of the current codebase, as well
> as a
> > 1.0 release of the dependant pcaudiolib project ([2]https://g
Reece Dunn, on Sat 10 Sep 2016 11:35:40 +0100, wrote:
> I have created a 1.49.0 stable release of the current codebase, as well as a
> 1.0 release of the dependant pcaudiolib project ([2]https://github.com/
> espeak-ng/pcaudiolib).
Also, are the generated voice files architecture-depen
Reece Dunn, on Sat 10 Sep 2016 11:35:40 +0100, wrote:
> I have created a 1.49.0 stable release of the current codebase, as well as a
> 1.0 release of the dependant pcaudiolib project ([2]https://github.com/
> espeak-ng/pcaudiolib).
Also, release tarballs usually contain ./configure
Hello,
Reece Dunn, on Sat 10 Sep 2016 11:35:40 +0100, wrote:
> I have created a 1.49.0 stable release of the current codebase, as well as a
> 1.0 release of the dependant pcaudiolib project ([2]https://github.com/
> espeak-ng/pcaudiolib).
Thanks!
I'm having an issue, though: ie
On 5 September 2016 at 22:02, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having a look at using espeak-ng instead of espeak in Debian, but I
> couldn't find a release for it. Is the last version in git supposed to
> stable? We don't usually take a random git snapsh
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Thibault
* Package name: espeak-ng
Version : git snapshot
Upstream Author : Reece H. Dunn
* URL : https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Multi-lingual
Hello,
I'm having a look at using espeak-ng instead of espeak in Debian, but I
couldn't find a release for it. Is the last version in git supposed to
stable? We don't usually take a random git snapshot of packages :)
Samuel
Hi,
I am the developer of a fork of the espeak project that came about due to
the extended absense of Jonathan Duddington (the author of espeak) and the
general slow pace of development on espeak. This fork is available at
https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng.
For a long time now I have been
71 matches
Mail list logo
