Hi all,
I am working the last couple of days to get emacspeak to work and
improve the packaging (which was long overdue in my opinion). I am
nearly there, but I have several questions and there are several issues.
1)
I am unable to get audio if I use eflite as synthesize server for both
current p
emacspeak-37 isn't building on archlinux because info documentation was
found broken and info documentation is in process of being fixed by
upstream. The errors were bad enough that they broke the make process.
That having been written, it will be a good idea to watch commits in
info for emac
> "ML" == Mario Lang writes:
ML> There is an alternative impelementation, but I am not sure if it
ML> is actively maintained by its upstream still.
If you mean speechd-el then the current version is OK. I'd say the
development activity in recent years is proportional to the activity
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 636408 ITA: emacspeak -- speech output interface to Emacs
Bug #636408 [wnpp] O: emacspeak -- speech output interface to Emacs
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: emacspeak -- speech output interface to Emacs' from
'O: emacspeak -- speech output in
retitle 636408 ITA: emacspeak -- speech output interface to Emacs
owner 636408 debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org
thanks
Hi all,
On 28-03-13 14:25, Mario Lang wrote:
> Paul Gevers writes:
>
>> I just saw that emacsspeak is up for adoption (already a long time),
>> that upstream is active, th
Paul Gevers writes:
> I just saw that emacsspeak is up for adoption (already a long time),
> that upstream is active, that there is a much newer release than the one
> currently in Debian. I myself am no user of such software, but as I am
> contributor to debian-accessibility, I was wondering how
I have used it, but not often. I think it's an important package, but I'm
no DD or DM and have almost no emacs knowledge. Perhaps working with the
emacs maintainers might be a good idea. I think there is a DD who uses it,
but I'm not sure. Speakup reads emacs output, but Emacspeak is a bette
Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I* use it when I can get it installed and set up properly. Debian is
> the only system in my recent memory where an emacspeak install went
> without problems. It's because the speech servers first get installed,
> then the install script runs and gets the user to select
Paul Gevers wrote:
> I just saw that emacsspeak is up for adoption (already a long time),
> that upstream is active, that there is a much newer release than the one
> currently in Debian. I myself am no user of such software, but as I am
> contributor to debian-accessibility, I was wondering how m
I* use it when I can get it installed and set up properly. Debian is
the only system in my recent memory where an emacspeak install went
without problems. It's because the speech servers first get installed,
then the install script runs and gets the user to select the speech
server, then fina
Hi,
I just saw that emacsspeak is up for adoption (already a long time),
that upstream is active, that there is a much newer release than the one
currently in Debian. I myself am no user of such software, but as I am
contributor to debian-accessibility, I was wondering how much of you are
using it
11 matches
Mail list logo
