Luke Yelavich, on Mon 21 Nov 2016 08:14:30 +1100, wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:20:38AM AEDT, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Why not, indeed. We could then put them in speech-dispatcher's
> > recommends or suggests as we see fit. I guess we want espeak-ng as
> > recommends, and possibly others as
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:20:38AM AEDT, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Why not, indeed. We could then put them in speech-dispatcher's
> recommends or suggests as we see fit. I guess we want espeak-ng as
> recommends, and possibly others as suggests?
That sounds perfectly reasonable. I'll take care of i
Hello,
Luke Yelavich, on Thu 17 Nov 2016 12:20:31 +1100, wrote:
> I am wondering whether we should do the same in Debian. In fact I
> wonder whether it makes sense for all modules other than dummy and
> generic to be in their own packages,
Why not, indeed. We could then put them in speech-dispatc
Hey folks.
In Ubuntu we have the flite Speech Dispatcher module split out into a separate
package, since at the time it was done, we were trying to shoot for fitting
into a CD footprint. This is no longer something we try to do, but so far as I
know, espeak supports more languages out of the box
4 matches
Mail list logo
