Re: [HEADS-UP part 2] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Scheibler
Hello, Samuel Thibault schrieb am 24.01.2017, 3:36 +0100: >So, can people please test libespeak-ng1 version 1.49.0+dfsg-7 which >should be available within a few hours? You can use the unstable >versions of espeakup (1:0.80-5) and brltty (5.4-6), do not use the >spurious. As others have alread

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Kirk Reiser, on Tue 24 Jan 2017 13:06:16 -0500, wrote: > I have to say the fixes you put in over the past day or so have > improved espeak-ng responsiveness emensely. Cool :) Samuel

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-24 Thread Kirk Reiser
Hello Samuel and all: I have to say the fixes you put in over the past day or so have improved espeak-ng responsiveness emensely. I've only done preliminary tests so far but it seems to behaving itself very well indeed. Almost instant flushing and clean sounding moving between lines with the revie

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test?Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Tom Fowle, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 20:31:27 -0800, wrote: > Am I correct to assume these versions do not effect use of speakup with > hardware synthesizers? Yes. > and would not apply to such setups using wheezie? It doesn't either. Samuel

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test?Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-23 Thread Tom Fowle
Am I correct to assume these versions do not effect use of speakup with hardware synthesizers? and would not apply to such setups using wheezie? Thanks Tom Fowle On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:31:24 +0100, wrote: > > Samuel

[HEADS-UP part 2] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Thanks to Sebastian's tests and reports (we ended up recording what was produced with his audio setup), I could track and find what I believe was the bug. So, can people please test libespeak-ng1 version 1.49.0+dfsg-7 which should be available within a few hours? You can use the unstable

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-23 Thread Mark Peveto
Samual, I don't have a lot in the way of technical knowledge, but I can try to help you test. What do you need? I don't use brltty, so if that's what you're lookin for I might not be much help. Mark Peveto Registered Linux user number 600552 Everything happens after coffee! On Mon, 23 Jan 201

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-23 Thread Sebastian Humenda
Hi Samuel Thibault schrieb am 23.01.2017, 15:43 +0100: >Sebastian Humenda, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 14:41:23 +0100, wrote: >> At the moment, I feel as if a really small cancel pause would be the option I >> could live best with. > >Just to check, did you try just plain 0 cancel pause ? I cannot hear a d

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thanks for your tests, Sebastian Humenda, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 14:41:23 +0100, wrote: > At the moment, I feel as if a really small cancel pause would be the option I > could live best with. Just to check, did you try just plain 0 cancel pause ? Samuel

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-23 Thread Sebastian Humenda
Hi Øyvind Øyvind Lode schrieb am 23.01.2017, 14:12 +0100: >I've upgraded both brltty and espeakup (remotely via ssh since I'm at work >now). >I'll help you out test later today. Please also upgrade brltty-espeak. >What exactly should I test? - Do you realize some kind of overlap when typing qu

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-23 Thread Øyvind Lode
Hi: I've upgraded both brltty and espeakup (remotely via ssh since I'm at work now). I'll help you out test later today. What exactly should I test? I vaguely remember seeing a thread about some issues but I must say that I never noticed it myself. On 23 January 2017 at 13:31, Samuel Thibault

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:31:24 +0100, wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:21:03 +0100, wrote: > > deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main > > to be more precise: after having added this line to > /etc/apt/sources.list, run > > apt-get update

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:21:03 +0100, wrote: > deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main to be more precise: after having added this line to /etc/apt/sources.list, run apt-get update apt-get install brltty=5.4-5 apt-get install espeakup=1:0.80-4 Samuel

[HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Could people really please test these brltty and espeakup packages? In short: if I don't get feedback very soon, I'll have to revert them to espeak for Stretch, which would be very sad. If there is something preventing from doing the tests, please tell, I can't guess it. Since the migrat

Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-15 Thread Hart Larry
While its a different type of package, I notice this overlap in 1 of the newer Voxin 1.6 in Vinux. Also while arrowing, speech rate seems to drop by 1 step until you re-read the current line. Hart

Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Sun 15 Jan 2017 15:57:48 +0100, wrote: > I'll try to introduce that in brltty too. I have uploaded brltty packages on http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/ too. The delay can be changed with the cancel_pause espeak parameter, e.g.: /sbin/brltty -S cancel_pause=150 blabla

Speech overlapping with espeak-ng

2017-01-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Kirk Reiser, on Fri 13 Jan 2017 09:50:24 -0500, wrote: > If you have speakup running with espeakup just review up or down the > screen with the 7 and 9 keys. You can feel the speech doesn't cut off > immediately and in fact it sounds like you are mixing the speech from > the previous line i