Re: No speakup-modules in squeeze now?

2010-09-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Gaijin, le Tue 14 Sep 2010 02:23:34 -0700, a écrit : > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 03:39:35PM +1000, Jason White wrote: > > That's simply because they're now included in Debian kernels by default. > > Weird. I have one machine saying one thing (the machine which > was upgraded from Lenny), and

Re: No speakup-modules in squeeze now?

2010-09-14 Thread Jason White
Gaijin wrote: > Weird. I have one machine saying one thing (the machine which > was upgraded from Lenny), and the new machine. Oh, and speakup doesn't > work in debian if there are more than 6 text consoles. I would suggest discussing it on the speakup mailing list, since not everyo

Re: No speakup-modules in squeeze now?

2010-09-14 Thread Gaijin
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 03:39:35PM +1000, Jason White wrote: > That's simply because they're now included in Debian kernels by default. Weird. I have one machine saying one thing (the machine which was upgraded from Lenny), and the new machine. Oh, and speakup doesn't work in debian if

Re: No speakup-modules in squeeze now?

2010-09-11 Thread Jason White
Gaijin wrote: > Just installed the amd64 squeeze build, entered: > > apt-cache search speakup > > ...and got squat. No speakup-modules to install. That's simply because they're now included in Debian kernels by default. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@

No speakup-modules in squeeze now?

2010-09-11 Thread Gaijin
Hello all, Just installed the amd64 squeeze build, entered: apt-cache search speakup ...and got squat. No speakup-modules to install. Think this happened once before back in my Shane's netinst days, where things didn't show up until I upgraded a kernel. Performed an

Re: Speakup modules in squeeze

2009-10-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 12:56 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:54:47AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > > Please review these and let the kernel team know whenever speakup needs > > > to be updated. Currently staging dr

Re: Speakup modules in squeeze

2009-10-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 12:56 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:54:47AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > Please review these and let the kernel team know whenever speakup needs > > to be updated. Currently staging drivers are only built for x86 because > > many of them

Re: Speakup modules in squeeze

2009-10-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:54:47AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Please review these and let the kernel team know whenever speakup needs > to be updated. Currently staging drivers are only built for x86 because > many of them are not really portable. I think this is not the case for > speakup,

Re: Speakup modules in squeeze

2009-10-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ben Hutchings, le Wed 14 Oct 2009 03:52:20 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 03:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > [...] > > > Those modules that may be needed at installation time will be added to > > > the linux-2.6 package, and the speakup modules are clearly among those. > > > I have add

Re: Speakup modules in squeeze

2009-10-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 03:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: [...] > > Those modules that may be needed at installation time will be added to > > the linux-2.6 package, and the speakup modules are clearly among those. > > I have added patches that put them under drivers/staging: > > > > svn://svn.deb

Re: Speakup modules in squeeze

2009-10-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Ben Hutchings, le Wed 14 Oct 2009 01:54:47 +0100, a écrit : > There is a big problem with the current linux-modules-extra-2.6 package, > which is that the resulting binary packages are related to their source > only by build-dependency, and this does not ensure that corresponding > source a

Speakup modules in squeeze

2009-10-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
There is a big problem with the current linux-modules-extra-2.6 package, which is that the resulting binary packages are related to their source only by build-dependency, and this does not ensure that corresponding source and binary packages are kept released together. The FTP team had to spend a