Bug#788189: it'll have to support java 6 to be able to build us

2015-09-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Then it should be documented on the wiki, not at a random point in time > in the java mailing list or bugreport. Maybe. Then take that to the people who do such things. I’m “just” a buildd admin. bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße

Bug#788189: it'll have to support java 6 to be able to build us

2015-09-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thorsten Glaser, le Tue 01 Sep 2015 09:58:54 +0200, a écrit : > On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > - "I don't think it is possible (yet) to have a >= dependency on a java > > version." and yes, I was lazy to look for a proper solution. > > It is, and precisely this was recommended

Bug#788189: it'll have to support java 6 to be able to build us

2015-09-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Samuel Thibault wrote: > - "I don't think it is possible (yet) to have a >= dependency on a java > version." and yes, I was lazy to look for a proper solution. It is, and precisely this was recommended on some Debian java mailing list or bugreport for precisely this problem.

Bug#788189: it'll have to support java 6 to be able to build us

2015-09-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thorsten Glaser, le Tue 01 Sep 2015 09:13:17 +0200, a écrit : > why don't you version the B-D then? > > Build-Depends: ..., default-jdk (>= 2:1.6), ... Because: - "I don't think it is possible (yet) to have a >= dependency on a java version." and yes, I was lazy to look for a proper solution.

Bug#788189: it'll have to support java 6 to be able to build us

2015-09-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, why don't you version the B-D then? Build-Depends: ..., default-jdk (>= 2:1.6), ... That will cause GCJ arches to not even attempt the build, beneficial for all. bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +