Chime,
There were a few things wrong with your installation - at least from our
last conversation.
You had both your voxin IBM-TTS voice installed and your new Voxin Embedded
voice installed; You cannot have both installed when you are using console
speech, you can have both if you just use orca
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Please could the BTS owners provide or approve a clearer wording for
> this, if they are the "owners" of the tag definition?
[...]
I'm open to any inclusive language which you all agree on. The point of
the tag was to help highlight bugs which impacted
Hi All: I hope I am subscribed to this list, as it was suggested by Paul, who's
name was in a README of this package.
Anyway, I am trying to get newer embedded voices from Voxin running in a Debian
SID 5.16.0-3 system. A version of speechd-up which tries to install is 0.5 from
Brailcom. But even
Chime Hart, le lun. 14 mars 2022 11:28:33 -0700, a ecrit:
> I would vote for the phrase "special needs" instead of any form of disabled,
> as it would seem more of a positive.
I understand that point of view. But then people will add the tag,
saying "I have a special need: I want to drive 3 screen
Simon McVittie, le lun. 14 mars 2022 18:21:41 +, a ecrit:
> "This bug particularly affects users with disabilities"
> if we're using a form of wording similar to that, because what we're
> interested in is whether a bug is *particularly* significant for users
> of accessibility technologies
I would vote for the phrase "special needs" instead of any form of disabled, as
it would seem more of a positive. Thank you
Chime
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 09:38:36 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
[ Simon McVittie wrote: ]
> > My understanding is that the a11y tag is intended to be for bugs that
> > harm Debian's usefulness for people who rely on assistive technologies
> > (screen readers, high contrast themes, etc.), and more general
On 3/14/22, john doe wrote:
> On 3/14/2022 12:53 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> Can anyone suggest a wording that makes the intention of the tag
>>> clearer,
>>> without "othering" the people who particularly need bugs with this tag
>>> to
>>> be fixed? I've c
8 matches
Mail list logo
