Re: brltty 6.0 is in Debian experimental

2019-10-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Alex ARNAUD, le mer. 09 oct. 2019 08:50:56 +0200, a ecrit: > After thinking and discusssing I assume pushing BRLTTY 6.0 to Sid seems the > way to go to expect having feedback from users. Sure! I'm just waiting for my transition request for the libbrlapi0.7 name change #941237 Samuel

Re: brltty 6.0 is in Debian experimental

2019-10-08 Thread Alex ARNAUD
Hello Samuel, I know that Jean-Philippe has tested this release without encountering any issue. After thinking and discusssing I assume pushing BRLTTY 6.0 to Sid seems the way to go to expect having feedback from users. Also, as Testing could be buggy I assume having a buggy software is a as

Re: Unusually long time to log in on fresh testing install

2019-10-08 Thread thomasw
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019, at 10:05 PM, thom...@fastmail.cn wrote: > I just did a fresh install of testing with the Mate desktop and > standard system utilities. I notice that after logging in it takes a > very long time for Orca to start. Can anyone reproduce this or is it just > me? Turns out its

Re: dbus-broker vs dbus-daemon for the accessibility bus

2019-10-08 Thread Chrys
Howdy, We use dbus-broker exclusive here. No issues at all and like you noted, it seems to perform faster, specially on heavy operations. Cheers chrys > Am 08.10.2019 um 14:29 schrieb thom...@fastmail.cn: > > For those not in the know, dbus-broker is a reimplementation of the > dbus-daemon.

dbus-broker vs dbus-daemon for the accessibility bus

2019-10-08 Thread thomasw
For those not in the know, dbus-broker is a reimplementation of the dbus-daemon. I am very interested in this subject when it comes to the accessibility bus. I have done two types of tests on debian. This requires building the broker from source and rebuilding at-spi2-core. Used cpu was an 8550u.