Bug#811773: espeakedit: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

Package: espeakedit Version: 1.48.03-3 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-narrowing This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released yet, but it's expected that GCC 6 will become the default compiler for stretch. Note that only th

Bug#811772: espeak: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

Package: espeak Version: 1.48.04+dfsg-2 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-narrowing This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released yet, but it's expected that GCC 6 will become the default compiler for stretch. Note that only t

Re: dark theme boot menu?

Hi Samuel, On Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2016, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Yes, that's why I'm wondering as soon as considering the 2nd > accessibility-related entry :) I think having 5-8 accessibility related shortcuts are probably fine, just like having 3-5 desktop environments to choose from… ;-) I a

Re: dark theme boot menu?

(Please keep both lists in Cc) Charlie Kravetz, on Tue 19 Jan 2016 17:40:03 -0700, wrote: > The more you add, the more you will be asked to add. Also, adding > extras makes it that much harder to not add next time. Yes, that's why I'm wondering as soon as considering the 2nd accessibility-related

Re: dark theme boot menu?

On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:24:44 +0100 Samuel Thibault wrote: >Hello, > >During discussions, it was raised that selecting the dark theme is not >really convenient: on the syslinux images one has to press tab and >append theme=dark, and on the grub images, one has to edit the grub >entry... > >So it w

dark theme boot menu?

Hello, During discussions, it was raised that selecting the dark theme is not really convenient: on the syslinux images one has to press tab and append theme=dark, and on the grub images, one has to edit the grub entry... So it was suggested that the dark theme could be an additional boot entry,